Working with Keplerian Elements & Deriving Vernal Equinox

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philosophaie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving Elements
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on utilizing Keplerian elements from the JPL website to derive various orbital parameters, including Mean Anomaly, Eccentric Anomaly, and True Anomaly, with a particular emphasis on the Vernal Equinox. The Vernal Equinox, occurring around March 21, is linked to the position of the Sun relative to the constellation Pisces, establishing a reference angle for the Ascending Node at approximately 270.02 degrees for Earth. The calculations presented suggest a relationship between the Vernal Equinox and specific angles throughout the year, indicating a systematic approach to understanding orbital mechanics. The user seeks validation of their findings and mentions challenges in converting celestial to galactic coordinates. Overall, the discussion highlights the application of Keplerian elements in determining key astronomical events and their implications.
Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
I am working with the Keplerian Elements from the JPL web site.

a - Semi-Major Axis
e - Eccentricity
I - Incilination
L - Mean Longitude
long.peri. - Longitude of the Periapsis
long.node.or N - Longitude of the Ascending Node

http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/txt/p_elem_t2.txt

From this you can derive

MA - Mean Anomaly
EA - Eccentric Anomaly
v - True Anomaly
r - Radius
Equ - Vernal Equinox

All of this data revolves around the v=0 point or the Periapsis, the point where the elliptical orbit is the closest to the sun. Now from this point the Vernal Equinox can be derived. The Vernal Equinox occurs on about March 21 every year. When looking thru the Sun on 3-21 the constellation that you see is Pisces. At the angle (the Sun to Pisces from the Periapsis) is the basis of the reference angle for the start of the Ascending Node, I think. It comes out to be 270.02 for the Earth. The data seems to be coming out right, Equ+N+w+v=0 @ 12-21, Equ+N+w+v=90 @ 3-21, Equ+N+w+v=180 @ 6-21 and Equ+N+w+v=270 @ 9-21. I just want to know If I am way off or I am right on target.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top