Wormholes aren't ruled out in the wonderful universe of relativity

Skynt
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
I'm interested in wormholes but my knowledge of advanced physics and general relativity is lacking. I was wondering, since I read that wormholes aren't ruled out in the wonderful universe of relativity, whether or not it would be possible for a man-made machine to open one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I have heard that. A wormhole is a "shortcut" through space-time. If the wormhole is traversable (to pass or move over, along, or through), matter can 'travel' from one end to the other by passing through the middle (What your trying to avoid). It is known that (Lorentzian) wormholes are not excluded within the framework of general relativity, but the physical plausibility of these solutions is uncertain. It is also unknown whether a theory of quantum gravity, merging general relativity with quantum mechanics, would still allow them. Most known solutions of general relativity which allow for traversable wormholes require the existence of exotic matter, a theoretical substance which has negative energy density. However, it has not been mathematically proven that this is an absolute requirement for traversable wormholes, nor has it been established that exotic matter cannot exist.

A wormhole also mean time travel. If you move at-or near the speed of light (299,792,458 m/s) through a wormhole, time would speed up for you, and slow down for others. If you and me were at the park and the year is 2008, if suddenly just through a wormhole, and when around the universe in a couple minuets, you may come back to see it was now the year 3008. In your fame of mind, you were only gone for minuets, while for me, I sat a the park for 1000 years waiting for you to return.

Hope I could help! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:


Skynt said:
I'm interested in wormholes but my knowledge of advanced physics and general relativity is lacking. I was wondering, since I read that wormholes aren't ruled out in the wonderful universe of relativity, whether or not it would be possible for a man-made machine to open one?

Here's an excerpt from a nice Wormhole FAQ that's relevant to your question:

How difficult would it be to create a wormhole?
The ability to create a traversable wormhole is well beyond current human technology. It would require the enlargement of one of the many submicroscopic quantum wormholes believed to exist within any volume of space. The process would likely require an intense, ultra-high frequency negative energy source -- something we have no idea how to produce.



The FAQ is taken from The Physics of Stargates: Parallel Universes, Time Travel, and the Enigma of Wormhole Physics by Enrico Rodrigo (2010).

According to the book, a lot of unsuccessful effort has gone into attempting to prove that wormholes are impossible (by finding a so-called "energy condition" that no matter can violate but whose violation the existence of wormholes requires.) As it stands today, wormholes are still theoretically possible.

Keep in mind, however, that it is also theoretically possible to reverse the rotation of our galaxy.
 


HarryRool said:
Keep in mind, however, that it is also theoretically possible to reverse the rotation of our galaxy.
Well said. :smile: This would be a good quote to keep around here on PF.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top