Would isolating the Solar System prevent its heat death?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Feynstein100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Heat Solar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a thought experiment regarding the potential effects of enclosing the Solar System in a hypothetical Dyson sphere made of ideal mirrors. This setup would reflect all of the Sun's energy back, theoretically preventing energy dispersion and maintaining a reversible state. However, participants concluded that this scenario would ultimately lead to an equilibrium temperature across the Solar System, resulting in a form of heat death, as the energy would still distribute within the sphere rather than being re-emitted by the Sun. The implications of such a system highlight the limitations of reversibility in thermodynamic processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of entropy
  • Knowledge of Dyson spheres and their theoretical applications
  • Basic principles of stellar fusion and energy emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of thermodynamic reversibility in closed systems
  • Explore the concept of Dyson spheres and their potential designs
  • Study the principles of energy distribution in thermodynamic systems
  • Investigate the lifecycle of stars and the processes leading to heat death
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in thermodynamics, energy systems, and the long-term fate of stellar bodies.

Feynstein100
Messages
181
Reaction score
17
I have a thought experiment in mind. Crudely speaking, the second law of thermodynamics implies that there is only a finite amount of change possible in the universe. Once this limit is reached, no more change can occur. The key thing here though is reversibility. If changes were reversible, then the entropy change would be zero and we could stay at the same entropy level indefinitely.
Considering only the Solar System, the sun is burning up its mass and converting it to energy, which then spreads out across the Milky Way and the rest of the universe. Again, according to the second law, once energy gets spread out, it cannot be concentrated again without expending more energy. So what if we stopped the energy from spreading out? Let's say we have some kind of Dyson sphere but instead of enclosing just the Sun, it encloses the entire Solar System. This hypothetical Dyson sphere is made out of ideal mirrors that reflect all of the Sun's energy without absorbing any of it, i.e. now all of the Sun's energy comes back to it and doesn't get spread out. What would happen in this theoretical scenario?
Would this cause the entire Solar System to be in a reversible state? The sun emits energy. This energy gets reflected back to the sun, and then re-emitted by the sun again, closing the loop. Of course, fusion would no longer occur but that's kind of the point. The sun is no longer burning itself up, and yet still shining.
Although, any closed system should eventually reach an equilibrium temperature across its entirety. So will that happen in this case too? Will the entire Solar System reach some equilibrium temperature and then not change anymore? Which, ironically, is heat death. I'm not sure what would happen. My mental simulation of this is kinda stuck lol. Could anybody help me out here?
 
Science news on Phys.org
If the Sun is still fusing: the solar system and everything in it continues to heat up. The rocky planets eventually become fully molten again, while the gas giants puff up and become superhot balls of gas. The Sun's photosphere heats up because of all the reflected radiation and its spectrum slowly shifts more and more towards the UV end. The inability to get rid of energy and heat causes the Sun's interior to heat up. Fusion occurs more rapidly in the core, which increases the energy generated, which raises the internal temp, which just further adds to the whole process, becoming a massive positive feedback loop.

Eventually, perhaps before the planets turn into superheated plasma from the ever increasing temperature from the Sun and the reflected radiation, the Sun either 1.) explodes from runaway fusion from the ever increasing temperature, 2.) puffs up into a giant sphere of plasma that engulfs most of the solar system and never shrinks, 3.) completes its multi-billion-year lifecycle in record time and we are left with a solar system that just consists of a variety of 'dead' objects sitting at thousands or millions of degrees (probably the latter, but maybe even hotter).

Keep in mind that the Sun contains about ##10^{44}## joules of potential fusion energy. This is about 500x more than its gravitational binding energy, which is the amount of energy it would take to disassemble it and pull all of its pieces very far away. This is a stupid amount of energy. If none of this energy can escape the solar system, the entire system would heat up beyond my ability to accurately calculate.
Feynstein100 said:
Of course, fusion would no longer occur but that's kind of the point.
Why wouldn't fusion still occur?
 
Feynstein100 said:
Although, any closed system should eventually reach an equilibrium temperature across its entirety. So will that happen in this case too? Will the entire Solar System reach some equilibrium temperature and then not change anymore?
Yes. Ultimately, whatever actually happens to the Sun is irrelevant. Eventually the entire solar system would be at the same temperature, whatever that happens to be in this hypothetical scenario.
 
Feynstein100 said:
The sun emits energy. This energy gets reflected back to the sun, and then re-emitted by the sun again, closing the loop.
This is the flaw, as others may have pointed out. It is not reversible.

The reflected energy does not return to the sun, and it cannot "re-emit" it. Instead, the reflected heat will be distributed within the sphere.
Feynstein100 said:
Will the entire Solar System reach some equilibrium temperature and then not change anymore?
This.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
656
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
779