Would you Hear a Stars Nuclear reactions if you were close to it?

PVastro
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Would you "Hear" a Stars Nuclear reactions if you were close to it?

Hey all,
This is more of a thought problem, but last night I was wondering about what it would be like to see a star up close (relatively speaking). Since stars are essentially a massive nuclear chain reaction you would think it would be a fairly noisy process. However while picturing this I realized sound cannot travel through a media-less vacuum like space.
So if you where sitting very close to a Star (excluding the fact radiation, heat, ect, would kill you) would it be completely silent, even with all of the massive reactions going on inside? Or in order for it to produce sound would you have to be inside the gas shell (gas as the medium for sound) in order to hear anything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


As you approach a star the density of the surrounding space starts at very very low, much lower than Earth's atmosphere, but starts to increase. If you were to be inside the stars atmosphere where the pressure is equal to 1 stp I would expect you to hear a great many things. Unfortunately I don't know if you could "hear" the nuclear reactions, as they happen so fast and in such great numbers that it wouldn't be a distinct sound. Plus you're talking about sound traveling through 300,000 km of very dense, multi-layered plasma. My guess is that you would hear random sounds that are generated by various means within the Suns outer layers, not the reactions themselves.
 


I see I should have worded it better. I was saying nuclear reactions because that what causes all the energy, but i really just meant would the star itself make any noise, nuclear reactions was just a lazy way of putting thank you though.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top