Write equation of translated graph in general form

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on translating the equation of an ellipse, initially given as 4x² + 5y² = 20, to account for a translation of T(-5, 6). The standard form of the ellipse is identified as (x²/5) + (y²/4) = 1, with the center at (0, 0). After translating, the new center becomes (-5, 6), leading to the equation (x + 5)²/5 + (y - 6)²/4 = 1. The final general form of the translated equation is derived as 4x² + 5y² + 40x - 60y + 260 = 0, and the discussion touches on the absence of the Bxy term, which appears in rotated conic sections. The conversation also explores methods for converting between standard and general forms, especially in cases involving conic sections with rotation.
wvcaudill2
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Identify the graph of each equation. Write the equation of the translated graph for T(-5,6) in general form. Then draw the graph.

4x2 + 5y2 = 20

Homework Equations


Ax2 + Bxy + Cy2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


I put the equation instandard form and got :

\frac{x^2}{5} + \frac{y^2}{4} = 1

This shows that it is a graph of an ellipse with center (0,0).

However, I wasnt sure what to do next. I found the translated points using matrices and adding, but I don't know what to do with this, ot even if I need this information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it standard form?
let's see,
(standard form) = 0
and your equation is
(some equation) = 1
 
wvcaudill2 said:

Homework Statement


Identify the graph of each equation. Write the equation of the translated graph for T(-5,6) in general form. Then draw the graph.

4x2 + 5y2 = 20

Homework Equations


Ax2 + Bxy + Cy2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


I put the equation instandard form and got :

\frac{x^2}{5} + \frac{y^2}{4} = 1

This shows that it is a graph of an ellipse with center (0,0).

However, I wasnt sure what to do next. I found the translated points using matrices and adding, but I don't know what to do with this, ot even if I need this information.

If the graph of the ellipse is translated left by 5 units and up 6 units, the center will move from (0, 0) to (-5, 6). How will this affect the equation
\frac{x^2}{5} + \frac{y^2}{4} = 1?

Tip: write your entire equation in one pair of [ tex] tags.
 
Mark44 said:
If the graph of the ellipse is translated left by 5 units and up 6 units, the center will move from (0, 0) to (-5, 6). How will this affect the equation
\frac{x^2}{5} + \frac{y^2}{4} = 1?

Tip: write your entire equation in one pair of [ tex] tags.

The equation will then become:

\frac{(x+5)^2}{5} + \frac{(y-6)^2}{4} = 1

NOw, how can I convert this into general form?
 
Multiply both sides by 20, expand (x + 5) and (y - 6)2, and bring everything to one side, with zero on the other side.
 
Mark44 said:
Multiply both sides by 20, expand (x + 5) and (y - 6)2, and bring everything to one side, with zero on the other side.

Ok, I get the following:


4x^2 + 5y^2 + 40x - 60y +260 = 0

This looks good, except there is no "Bxy" term. When would this term appear?

Looking through my older notes, I found a few problems where i converted from standard form to general form before. However, it looks like that way I did it was by setting up a system of 3 equations, and somehow solving for the variables D, E, and F. Can this method I mentioned by used on anything other than circles?


Lastly, will the method you showed me work with all types of conic sections?
 
The xy term shows up when conic sections (such as an ellipse in this problem) are rotated.
wvcaudill2 said:
Looking through my older notes, I found a few problems where i converted from standard form to general form before. However, it looks like that way I did it was by setting up a system of 3 equations, and somehow solving for the variables D, E, and F. Can this method I mentioned by used on anything other than circles?
I don't understand what you're saying here. To convert from general form to standard form (if I remember these terms correctly), you complete the square in the x terms and in the y terms. If you're talking about the general form with an xy term, it's been a very long time since I've done that, so can't commit on the method you describe.
 
If you have a conic section with Ax^2+ Bxy+ Cy^2 (and other non-squared terms) with C not 0, you can get rid of it in either of two ways:

1) Let x= x' cos(\theta)- y' sin(\theta), y= x' sin(\theta)+ y' cos(\theta), replace x and y in your formula by that, and solve for a value of \theta that make Bxy= 0. \theta is the angle through which the axes are rotated and the entire equation with x', y' instead of x, y will have no "xy" term.


2) Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix
\begin{bmatrix}A & \frac{1}{2}C \\ \frac{1}{2}C & D\end{bmatrix}

The eigenvectors will point along line y= ax and y= bx, that are parallel to the axes of the conic and substituting x'= ax- y, y'= bx- y will get rid of the "xy" term.
 
Back
Top