Writing Output in State Space Form: RLC Circuit Example

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on representing the output of an RLC circuit in state space form, specifically addressing the equation y = cx + du. Participants explore how to express the output, such as the voltage across a resistor, when it is not a direct combination of state variables like capacitor voltage (vc) and inductor current (IL). The conversation emphasizes the necessity of converting transfer functions to state space form to identify the A, B, C, and D matrices. It is noted that all variables must be expressed as state space variables to utilize this form effectively. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying state space representation in circuit analysis.
asad1111
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
the general form of state space output is y=cx+du which means that output is linear combination of state variables and inputs my question is can we write output in this form when our output is not combination of state variable for example in rlc circuit state variables are vc and IL now if we want to take output 'voltage across resistor' how can we represent it in form y=cx+du
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Use the phasor equivalents for the circuit (capacitors = 1/sC and inductors = sL) and figure out the transfer function of your circuit (Vo/Vi). Then convert the transfer function to state space form and you will be able to break out the A, B, C, D parts.
 
okay but how will you explain it to anybody by looking at output equation y=cx+d when output is merely combination of state space variables
 
I'm a total newbie on this, but from what I've read, you need to express all variables as a state space variable if you want to use them in a state space form. For example, when you want to incorporate an excitation system into a SMIB model, you have to express the variables of the excitation system as a function of state variables. (Kundur Chapter 12) But like a said I'm a total newbie.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top