X-Ray Diffraction Equation (Mineralogy HW)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the X-Ray diffraction equation that connects the reflection angle (theta), wavelength (lambda), and d spacing (d) in mineralogy. The poster expresses frustration after struggling for two days to solve the problem and seeks assistance to understand the physics and mathematics involved. Key considerations include the conditions for constructive and destructive interference of reflected waves, which are crucial for the derivation. The poster also hints at needing a specific value of theta to observe the diffraction effect. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of grasping the foundational concepts of X-Ray diffraction for solving related problems.
Maxilen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Okay so, I was hoping someone out there might be able to assist me with a Mineralogy problem I have. The concept is based around X-Ray Diffraction.

The question:

Derive a diffraction equation from the illustration below that relates the reflection angle (theta) to the wavelength (lambda) and the d spacing (d). Show all of your work so that it is clear that you understand the physics and the math in this important derivation.

Here is a picture of the diagram given...sorry for the poor quality :)
http://yfrog.com/5m0331102025j

I've been banging my head against this for two days now, and I just don't seem to be getting anywhere with this...Ive tried google, my book, everything at my disposal, I just can't seem to figure this out at all...I am at a stand still because there are 5 other questions related to this problem, but i need to solve this first...can anyone help...Thanks in advance for your time! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess it is not for any theta, but for a specific value of theta? One that gives some observable effect? For that effect to happen - is there anything you can tell about FG?

--
 
Start with one of the fundamental considerations:
in terms of that diagram, what are the conditions for constructive vs. destructive interference of the reflected waves?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top