X-ray question - frequencies and energies

AI Thread Summary
Higher frequency X-rays possess greater ionizing and penetrating power due to their increased energy, which allows them to interact more vigorously with matter. Gamma rays, despite having higher frequencies, have lower ionizing power primarily because they are neutral and lack mass, meaning their interaction with charged particles is minimal. The penetrating power of radiation is inversely related to the probability of interaction, which decreases with higher energy levels. For alpha and beta radiation, increasing their speed can enhance their ionizing power, but the relationship is complex and influenced by other factors. Overall, the discussions emphasize the roles of energy, charge, and mass in determining the properties of different types of radiation.
Deathnote777
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
X-ray question -- frequencies and energies

Homework Statement


1. Why does x-ray with higher frequency possesses higher ionizing power and penetrating power ?
2. Will gamma ray with higher frequency possesses higher ionizing power and penetrating power ? And is "gamma ray has no mass" a reason accounting for its low ionizing power ?
3. Then for alpha and beta radiation, will they possesses higher ionizing power and penetrating power by increasing their speed ? Thank you.

Homework Equations



Nil

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Is it because energy of it increase ? So it can hit air molecules more vigorously and possesses higher KE and travel longer ?
2. I think mass should be one of the reasons just like that of alpha radiation. But my book says it is not. Only charge affect gamma 's ionizing power
3. I think yes ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


1. Is it because energy of it increase ? So it can hit air molecules more vigorously and possesses higher KE and travel longer ?
The first part is right, but the increased penetrating power is a different effect - the probability of an interaction goes down with increasing energy. This is a result of quantum mechanics, I don't know of any classical model to explain it.
And is "gamma ray has no mass" a reason accounting for its low ionizing power ?
I don't think this is a meaningful question. If a photon would have mass (in particular, enough to see it in gamma ray absorption), we would live in a completely different world.
Only charge affect gamma 's ionizing power
Charge in the absorber - the gamma rays (photons) have no charge.

3. I think yes ?
Right
 


Thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top