Which Has a Higher Metabolic Rate: Yeast Cells or Corn Seedlings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dphan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cells
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the metabolic rates of yeast cells and corn seedlings on a mass-specific basis, particularly focusing on CO2 production. It is noted that the metabolic rate of yeast cells will decrease as glucose availability diminishes, ultimately halting ATP production when glucose is exhausted. Measuring metabolic rate can be effectively done through CO2 output, with emphasis on how leaves in corn seedlings utilize CO2 differently than yeast cells. The conversation also touches on the importance of glucose concentration for yeast cells, where lower glucose means reduced ATP production. Overall, understanding the mass-specific activity of both organisms is crucial for accurate comparison.
dphan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1) Will yeast cells or corn seedling have a higher metabolic rate when compared on a mass specific basis?



2) How will decreasing the amount of glucose affect the rate of ATP production by the cells if the amount of yeast is held constant?

Answer: the rate of ATP production will decrease until all of the glucose available for glycolysis is used up. At this point the ATP production will become zero because no more glucose is available. (is this the correct answer?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you measure metabolic rate? One way is to measure CO_2 production.

So, the question is asking how are these two different with regard to CO2 production?
(remember - the question is on a mass specific basis, so you count the mass of leaves)
What do leaves do with CO_2 - that yeast cells do not do?
 
#2 deals with the amount of glucose each yeast cell can get a hold of to metabolize into ATP.

This is because the number of yeast cells (say 100) stays the same, but the glucose concentration goes down. Each yeast cell has less glucose to use, less glucose=less ATP.
 
I think the metabolism is better measured by the rate of sugar or starch usage in this case. If I interpret the meaning of 'mass-specific' activity based on mass of organism, the answer is likely straightforward. What percent of the mass of the corn seedling is actually growing vs that of the yeast cell? Does the corn seedling include the monocot?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top