Yes, this is correct. The solution to the equation for X0 is -1 / (-K - C*S).

  • Thread starter Thread starter MMCS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Unit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around solving a differential equation related to a unit impulse and its Laplace transform. The initial formulation of the equation included incorrect terms, specifically the inclusion of x0 where δ(t) should be. Participants emphasize the need to correctly express the differential equation and clarify the signs in the equation. There is confusion regarding the application of Laplace transforms, particularly in how to represent the derivative of x. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying mathematical principles in the context of Laplace transforms.
MMCS
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
Please see attached for problem and schematic

I know from the question i should expect a decaying exponential funtion.

Input: a unit impulse denoted in the laplace transform is 1
outputs: -Kx0 - Cdx/dt

-Kx0 - Cdx/dt +1 = 0

factorise

X0 ( -K - C*S) + 1 = 0

-1 / ( -K - C*S ) = X0

Is this correct up to now?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
No. You have been intermixing terms from the differential equation with terms from the LT equation. You need to start out by getting the differential equation correct. Express the differential equation in terms of x and δ(t). There shouldn't be an x0 in the differential equation, but there should be a δ(t).

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
No. You have been intermixing terms from the differential equation with terms from the LT equation. You need to start out by getting the differential equation correct. Express the differential equation in terms of x and δ(t). There shouldn't be an x0 in the differential equation, but there should be a δ(t).

Chet

So..

δ(t) = -Kx - C(dx/dt) ?
 
MMCS said:
So..

δ(t) = -Kx - C(dx/dt) ?
There should be plus signs on the RHS. Look back at your figure. After correcting this, what is the LT of the equation?

chet
 
Chestermiller said:
There should be plus signs on the RHS. Look back at your figure. After correcting this, what is the LT of the equation?

chet

im not sure but should it be

δ(t) = -Kx + C(dx/dt)?

My reasoning is that the spring will oppose the impulse and the damper will act in the same direction?

If so, Taking laplace transforms ( I am very new to the topic )


1 = -Kx + C*S*X0(S)?
 
MMCS said:
im not sure but should it be

δ(t) = -Kx + C(dx/dt)?

My reasoning is that the spring will oppose the impulse and the damper will act in the same direction?

Vector force exerted by spring and damper on bar = (kx+c\frac{dx}{dt})(-\vec{i_x})
Vector force by impulse on bar = δ(t)(+\vec{i_x})
Sum of forces on massless bar equal to zero:
(kx+c\frac{dx}{dt})(-\vec{i_x})+δ(t)(+\vec{i_x})=0\vec{i_x}
or
-(kx+c\frac{dx}{dt})+δ(t)=0


If so, Taking laplace transforms ( I am very new to the topic )

1 = -Kx + C*S*X0(S)?
If you're learning how to use Laplace transforms, then you have to learn it right. Is this a course in Laplace transforms? According to your book, what is the Laplace transform of the function dx/dt if x = x0 at t = 0?

Chet
 
Back
Top