Yet another epsilon-delta proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjgawp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the limit of the function as x approaches negative infinity, specifically that lim_{x \to -\infty} (2/√(x^4 + 1)) = 0. Participants express confusion regarding the logical steps in the epsilon-delta proof, particularly about the relationship between negative and positive values in the context of the limit. Clarifications are made about the absolute value and inequalities, emphasizing that for x < 0, the absolute value of 1/x is indeed -1/x, which is positive. The conversation also touches on the need for better resources on epsilon-delta proofs, with suggestions for further learning. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities and common misunderstandings surrounding limit proofs in calculus.
bjgawp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that \lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{2}{\sqrt{x^{4}+1}}=0\


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Preliminary Work
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/401/proofzr7.jpg

Before proceeding on with the proof, when we look at the last line there seems to be a logical problem. We know that \epsilon > 0 and x < N < 0 . Thus, it seems counter-intuitive that x is greater than a positive expression but less than a negative. Just a guess but I think it has something to deal with the second last line involving the square root. Thanks in advance!

Edit: Are there any texts that you guys suggest for learning epsilon-delta proofs? The examples that we do in class seem to be repetitive but when it becomes more abstract and general, some ingenuinity is needed and I would like to see some of these proofs worked out. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should move this to calculus for better results and don't expect much. Delta-epsilon proof is a confusing topic
 
It sure is counterintuitive. How can you say that the solution set to |x|>C is C<x<-C? Don't you mean x<-C or x>C?? E.g. imagine C=2.
 
How do i get from the penultimate line to a solution for x? If I proceed:
x < \sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon^{2}}-1} and set N to that when we give the formal proof, this would contradict one of our initial statements that N < 0 since the expression \sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon^{2}}-1} must be positive. So I'm not sure what the solution set of x would be.
 
Last edited:
Can you use what you know about x<0? So from your next to last line, say
|x| &gt;\sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon}-1}
-|x|&lt;\sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon}-1}&lt; |x|, but you know that x=-|x|

Okay, I obviously need to work on my tex communication skills, but hopefully you can make sense of this.
 
Last edited:
Call C your fourth root expression. Yes, C is positive. You want |x|>C and x negative. You want x<-C. I don't see your 'contradictions'.
 
Ah it's all clicked in guys. So for the formal proof I'll set N = -C.

Edit: Sorry if I need to post another thread but just a quick question about a simpler proof.
Prove that \lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{1}{x}=0

In the solutions manual:
For x < 0, |\frac {1}{x}-0|=- \frac{1}{x}. If \epsilon > 0 is given, then - \frac {1}{x}&lt; \epsilon which means x < - \frac{1}{\epsilon}.

Take N = - \frac{1}{\epsilon}. Then,

x &lt; N
x &lt; -\frac{1}{\epsilon}
|-\frac{1}{x} - 0| = -\frac{1}{x} &lt; \epsilon
So, \lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{1}{x}=0

My problem is with the initial statement claiming that |\frac {1}{x}-0|=- \frac{1}{x}. I fail to see how this works as the absolute value of a function yields positive values, does it not? And wouldn't the proof work if we just made the condition that \frac{1}{x} &lt; 0 &lt; \epsilon , implying that x &lt; 0 &lt; \frac{1}{\epsilon}?

I apologize in advance if my train of thought isn't presented very clearly. Thanks again!
 
Again, your limit is as x approaches neg inf, so x is negative. So the absolute value |1/x -0| = -1/x is positive.
 
Also, since x<0, when you multiply both sides of 1/x < eps by x, the inequality flips. Does that make sense? You know that eps is positive and x is negative, so you can't say that 1/eps < x. Sorry for my lack of tex. I'm working on that.
 
  • #10
Ah It all fell into place. Thanks a lot klile82 and Dick!

I'll definitely be back with more ... XD
 
  • #11
Following Dick's advice and posting a new thread.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
The statement you want to prove doesn't make much sense. Could you post it exactly as stated? And I would suggest you start another thread with a new problem. You'll get a lot more attention that way. If I see an active thread with over 5 posts, I don't generally don't even check it. Figure the issue is in the process of being beaten to death. Or that the poster is so confused no one can help.
 
  • #13
Sure no problem. And i wrote the question wrong, sorry!
 
Back
Top