How Fast Do Entwined Movie Foes Slide After a Stuntman Swings?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed at which a stuntman and villain slide after a stuntman swings down from a ledge. The stuntman, weighing 80 kg, swings down 5 meters, reaching a speed of 9.9 m/s at the bottom of the arc using conservation of energy. Upon colliding with the villain, who weighs 70 kg, conservation of momentum is applied to find their combined sliding speed of 5.98 m/s. For the sliding distance, the kinetic friction coefficient of 0.215 is used, resulting in a calculated distance of 6.6 meters. The calculations and methods used are confirmed to be correct.
janiexo
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I've been messing around with this problem for a while now and am getting absolutely nowhere. I was wondering if anyone could help me work it out...

--A movie stuntman (mass 80.0 kg) stands on a window ledge 5.0 m above the floor. Grabbing a rope attached to a chandelier, he swings down to grapple with the movie's villain (mass 70.0 kg), who is standing directly under the chandelier. (Assume that the stuntman's center of mass moves downward 5.0 m. He releases the rope just as he reaches the villain.)
A: With what speed do the entwined foes start to slide across the floor?
Take the free fall acceleration to be 9.8
B: If the coefficient of kinetic friction of their bodies with the floor is mu_k= 0.215, how far do they slide?

I don't recall doing anything at all like this in class and can't find any examples like this so I'm really at a loss as to how to approach it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First find the stuntman's horizontal velocity just before impact. Since he is swinging on a rope, all of his velocity will be horizontal at the bottom of the arc, and you can use conservation of energy to get his velocity. Then use conservation of momentum to get the velocity of the combined stuntman/villain, assuming they stick together. Finally, use the force of friction times distance equals the work done by friction, and find how far they must go for this to equal their starting kinetic energy.

In case you're wondering why you use conservation of energy for the first and last part and momentum for the middle part, I'll explain that real quick. They are both always conserved, but sometimes one of them goes into parts of the problem you aren't interested in. In the first and last part, momentum is conserved because the Earth moves slightly as the guy moves, but you can obviously ignore this effect. You can always ignore momentum conservation when considering friction against the ground and you can ignore the component of momentum in the direction of gravity when you use a constant gravitational field instead of the GMm/r equation. Finally, for the second part, some energy goes to heat in an inelastic collision, so conservation of energy wouldn't help you. I don't know if you wanted all that extra information, but there it is.
 
Ok I think I understand. I did what you said and ended up with the velocity of the stuntman at the bottom of the arc being 9.9m/s (using conservation of energy: mgh=1/2*mv^2 since initial velocity is 0 and final height is 0). Then used conservation of momentum: m1(9.9)=(m1+m2)v_final and ended up with the velocity being equal to 5.98m/s.

For the 2nd part I came up mu_k*N*d=1/2*m*v^2 with N = mg and got a distance of 6.6
Have I done it correctly?
 
Looks good.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top