You have to recognize the formula for an LC circuit and its resonance frequency.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimbob999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Impedance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the impedance of an LC circuit and understanding its resonance frequency. The participant initially calculated the impedance as 100 ohms but received feedback indicating the need to consider complex impedance due to phase differences. The correct approach involves using the formulas for inductive and capacitive reactance, leading to a recalculated impedance of 173 ohms. Clarifications were provided regarding the distinction between angular frequency and resonance frequency, emphasizing the importance of these concepts in the calculations. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the necessity of understanding complex impedance in LC circuit analysis.
Jimbob999
Messages
26
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The impedance of the circuit shown is:

q13-1.jpg

A. 41.1 Ω

B. 100 Ω

C. 173 Ω

D. 187 Ω

E. 241 Ω

Homework Equations


Z= sqrt (R^2 + [Xinduct - Xcapac]^2)
Wd = 1/sqrt(L * C)
Xinduct = WdL
Xcapac = 1/WdC

The Attempt at a Solution



I think my issues come with the 2nd to 4th equations.
The answer I get is 100 ohms, which i get as wrong, I follow the below logic
Wd = 1/sqrt (0.0002*0.5)
Wd=100
Xinduct = 0.02
Xcapac = 0.02
thus Z = R which is 100 ohms.

Where have I gone wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jimbo,

You want to work with the complex impedance, because there is a phase involved.
So ##Z_L = j\omega L ## and ##Z_C = {1\over j\omega C}##.

Are you comfortable with that approach ?
 
BvU said:
Hi Jimbo,

You want to work with the complex impedance, because there is a phase involved.
So ##Z_L = j\omega L ## and ##Z_C = {1\over j\omega C}##.

Are you comfortable with that approach ?

Is Jw here the same as the angular frequency wd?

The textbook chapter that this refers to says nothing about complex impedance as opposed to regular impedance, so I am not sure I get what you mean?
 
##\omega## is the angular frequency allright, but not the LC resonance frequency ##\omega_r## (*)
It is the driving frequency in the circuit under consideration, so in this case ##50 \times 2\pi = 100 \pi ## rad/s.


(*) your wd, for which ##\ |Z_{LC}| = 0\ ## from $$\ j\omega L + {1\over j\omega C} = j\omega L\; \left ( 1 + {1\over j^2\omega^2 LC }\right ) = j\omega L\; \left ( 1 - {1\over \omega^2 LC }\right )\ = 0 $$ if ## \omega^2 LC = 1##, a frequency of ##100/2\pi## Hz.
 
zrlc.gif

I have a feeling this picture tells me all I need?

w = 2pi *50
Xc = 15.92
XL = 157.08

Thus Z = 173, thus C.

Is that correct reasoning?
 
Yes. But now I am afraid you have no idea where the ##X_L - X_C## comes from ...
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top