Young tableaux and tensor product

302021895
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am working on all of the problems from Georgi's book in Lie algebras in particle physics (independent study), but I am stuck on one of them. The question is the following:

"Find (2,1)x(2,1) (in su(3) using Young tableaux). Can you determine which representations appear antisymmetrically in the tensor product, and which appear symmetrically?"

I understand the first part, and I get that (diagram - representation - dimension)

xxx (2,1) [15]
x

times

xxx (2,1) [15]
x

=

xxxxxx (4,2) [60]
xx

+

xxxxxx (5,0) [21]
x
x

+

xxxxx (2,3) [42]
xxx

+

xxxxx (3,1) [24]
xx
x

+

xxxx (0,4) [15]
xxxx

+

xxxx (1,2) [15]
xxx
x

+

xxx (0,1) [3]
xxx
xx

+

xxxxx (3,1) [24]
xx
x

+

xxxx (1,2) [15]
xxx
x

+

xxxx (2,0) [6]
xx
xx

I don't quite get the second part. How can one determine from this which representations appear symmetrically or antisymmetrically in the tensor product? Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To do part two you need to use the "standard" Young's tableaux, which are obtained by filling in the frames with integers in standard order, left to right and top to bottom. Use primed integers for the second factor. Thus the standard frames for (2,1) x (2,1) are:

1 2 3
4

1' 2' 3'
4'

You decomposed the direct product by starting with the first factor and attaching the squares of the second factor to it in all possible ways. So now in the tableau, consider the permutation 1 ↔ 1', 2 ↔ 2', etc. This is an involution, and therefore either an odd or even permutation. Even means that rep belongs to the symmetric part of the product, odd means it's antisymmetric.

For example, take [42], which was

xxxxx
xxx

The standard tableau is

1 2 3 1' 2'
4 3' 4'

Switching the 1's, 2's and 4's are all even since they only involve horizontal moves. But switching 3 with 3' is a vertical move, hence odd. We conclude therefore that [42] is antisymmetric.
 
Last edited:
Awesome! Thanks for the help!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top