Young's double slit experiment question.

AI Thread Summary
In Young's double slit experiment, the interference pattern shows an intensity ratio of 9 between bright and dark fringes. The discussion focuses on determining the correct interpretation of this ratio, with option 3 suggesting an amplitude ratio of three as the correct answer. Participants agree that since intensity is proportional to the square of amplitude, an amplitude ratio of three results in a probability ratio of nine. A clarification about the relationship between intensity and amplitude is also made to avoid confusion. The consensus supports that the amplitude ratio being three is indeed the correct interpretation.
Mr Virtual
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
Hi
I don't know whether this is a homework-type question or not, so I am posting it here.

In young's double slit experiment the interference pattern is found to have an intensity ratio between bright and dark fringes as 9. What does this imply:
(Below are the options provided in the book. One of them is the correct answer)
1. the intensities at the screen duo to the two slits are 5 nd 4 units respectively
2. the intensities at the screen are 4 units and 1 unit respectively
3. the amplitude ratio is three
4. The amplitude ratio is two

What is the correct answer?

As far as I think, option 3 is correct, because if amplitude ratio is 3, then probability ratio will automatically be (amp^2)=3^2=9.
Am I right?

Mr V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Virtual said:
Hi

As far as I think, option 3 is correct, because if amplitude ratio is 3, then probability ratio will automatically be (amp^2)=3^2=9.
Am I right?

Mr V

The intensity is proportional to the amplitude squared so I would agree with you. I would also pick #3.
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
The amplitude is proportional to the intensity squared so I would agree with you. I would also pick #3.

I know this is just a typo but just to make sure that it does not cause confusion for the OP, G01 meant to say that the intensity is proportional to the amplitude squared.

sorry, it's just a tiny detail and I know that G01 knows that.


Cheers
 
Thanks a lot.

Mr V
 
nrqed said:
I know this is just a typo but just to make sure that it does not cause confusion for the OP, G01 meant to say that the intensity is proportional to the amplitude squared.

sorry, it's just a tiny detail and I know that G01 knows that.


Cheers

Thanks for pointing it out. I have fixed the typo in my above post.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top