Young's double-slit interference?

AI Thread Summary
In a Young's double-slit experiment with slits 0.102 mm apart and light of 580 nm wavelength, the path length differences for the second order bright fringe and second dark fringe are being calculated. The initial calculation for the bright fringe was incorrect due to a unit conversion error from meters to micrometers. Clarification is sought regarding the definition of the second dark fringe, specifically whether it refers to the second dark fringe in sequence or its position between bright fringes. The discussion emphasizes that the differences in path lengths are significant compared to the wavelength, and further resources are suggested for a deeper understanding of quantum interference. Accurate calculations and conceptual clarity are essential for solving these types of problems.
kimlu
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a Young's double-slit experiment, a set of parallel slits with a separation of 0.102 mm is illuminated by light having a wavelength of 580 nm and the interference pattern observed on a screen 4.50 m from the slits.
(a) What is the difference in path lengths from the two slits to the location of a second order bright fringe on the screen?
(b) What is the difference in path lengths from the two slits to the location of the second dark fringe on the screen, away from the center of the pattern?

Homework Equations



x/L = λ/d
x= 2λL/d

3. The Attempt at a Solution

2(580E-9)(4.5)/ (.000102)= .051m

I'm supposed to have it in µm and I put 51,176 but I kept getting the question wrong, what am i doing wrong?
Also for the second part I am confused on fringes since its the 2nd dark fringe does that mean the 2nd fringe that is dark which is between the 1st and 2nd order bright or a dark fringe that is 2 which is between the 3rd and 4th order bright. Am i even thinking about this the right way, each dark fringe is 1/2λ correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You calculated the distance between things on the screen (and got the conversion m -> µm wrong), that's not what you are supposed to calculate.

The differences in path lengths are comparable to the wavelength.

Am i even thinking about this the right way, each dark fringe is 1/2λ correct?
1/2λ is just one option.
 
thanx
 
Last edited:
Do a search on "Quantum interference with slits" by Thomas Marcella. It is in arxive.org. It gives a full quantum analysis of the two-slit geometry.
 
Phil Lawless said:
Do a search on "Quantum interference with slits" by Thomas Marcella. It is in arxive.org. It gives a full quantum analysis of the two-slit geometry.
Be sure to check the date of the post you are replying to... :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
783
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top