Young's Double Slit with an Optical Flat over one slit

truth is life
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a Young's double slit-type experiment using light of 600 nm with 0.5 mm between fringes, a thin plate of glass (d = 100 micrometers, n =1.5) is placed over one of the slits. What is the lateral fringe displacement on the screen?

2. The attempt at a solution

To be entirely honest, I really have no idea how to even start approaching this problem. I can see that obviously there will be *something* involving optical path length in there (the plate clearly increases it), but I have no real idea of what equations will be involved or how to go about doing anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Number of wavelength in glass of width L is
<br /> N=\frac{L}{\lambda (n)}<br />

where

<br /> \lambda (n)=\frac{\lambda}{n}<br />

where
<br /> \lambda \ is \ in \ vacuum.<br />

So we get
<br /> N=\frac{Ln}{\lambda }.<br />

One wavelength gives phase shift 2 \pi and N

<br /> \Phi=2 \pi N=2 \pi \frac{Ln}{\lambda }.<br />

At first a wave moves distance L in vacuum where n=1 and the phase shift is

<br /> \Phi_1=2 \pi \frac{L}{\lambda }.<br />

and in glass

<br /> \Phi_2=2 \pi \frac{Ln}{\lambda }.<br />

So the phase difference is

<br /> \Delta \Phi=\Phi_2-\Phi_1=2 \pi \frac{L(n-1)}{\lambda }.<br />

So a beam without a glass plate will have to go a longer distance to compensate this additional
phase shift.
 
Thanks zzzoak. So now we still have to calculate the optical path difference in the air between the fringes and the screen where the image is seen, right?
From what you got, we would have to add 2 \pi \frac{L(n-1)}{\lambda } to the optical path of waves leaving the glass, right?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top