Yup another oh crap I don't have the book issue. EM Fields, Wangsness

  • Thread starter Thread starter schattenjaeger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Em Fields
schattenjaeger
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Yup another "oh crap I don't have the book" issue. EM Fields, Wangsness

my elements of solid state physics book finally came in the mail but now I need my EM book

If you have it I just need the questions, the book got returned to sender so I need to wait longer for it than expected(I'm not having ANY luck with that this semester)

Anyways, Wangsness' EM Fields, 2nd ed.

1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.15, 1.23, 1.24

I've already sent emails to classmates but they suck at checking e-mails sometimes

Hmm, that IS a lot of problems to type out, but I'd appreciate it forrrevverrrrr
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Emailing you the problems wouldn't do you any good, they refer to equations in the text by number.

I love Wangsness as a text and if I didn't I would sell it to you. I consider it to be the best text E&M text out there at junior/senior undergrad level.
 
Well unfortunately I'm in a jam 'cuz it's due tomorrow(I expected the book by Friday, got the oops we screwed you email on Friday, and was indisposed alllll Saturday)

if you could just e-mail them I'll try my luck without the pretty numbered equations(the vector and vector calculus and math review of chapter 1 is really similar to what's in my mechanics text's chapter it seems, I could probably figure out what I needed)e-mail's schattenjaeger@verizon.net I'll love you foreverrrrr
 
You're my hero!
 

Thread 'Direction of the magnetic field of an oscillating charge'

Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
View full post »

Thread 'Initial conditions for orbits around a wormhole'

Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
View full post »

Similar threads

A syllabus of books/literature from calculus to group theory to QFTs
Replies
26
Views
18K
MHB Difference equation tutorial: draft of part II
Replies
2
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top