Z-operator acting on an angular momentum quantum state

QuantumKyle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to show that < n l m | z | n l m > = 0 for all states | n l m>

2. Relevent Equations:

L^2 = Lx^2 + Ly^2 + Lz ^2
Lx = yp(z) - zp(y)
Ly = zp(x) - xp(z)
Lz = xp(y) - yp(x)
L+/- = Lx +/- iLy

The Attempt at a Solution



I really don't know where to begin because z is not an eigenfuntion of | n l m> (and if it was this equation would not be 0 anyways). My intuition tells me that I need to somehow represent z as a function of the operators L^2, Lz, and maybe L+/-. But I can't seem to isolate z. Maybe I'm looking at this problem the wrong way. Is there some fundamental theorem that would show that this equation is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is certainly a way to use the algebra, but it's actually eaasier if you look at the wavefunctions in position space.
The wavefunction is basically a Laguerre Polynomial with respect to r times a spherical harmonics.
The spherical harmonics is basically a complex exponential of phi times an associated Legendre polynomial with respect to \cos \theta which is \hat{z}.
Now, check the first recurrence relation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Legendre_polynomials#Recurrence_formula
and you will see that multiplying with \hat{z}=\cos \theta, which is the argument of the Legendre polynomial, gives you P_{l+1}^m(\cos \theta) and P_{l-1}^m(\cos \theta) (with awkward coefficients), so effectively you'll get |n l+1 m> and |n l-1 m>.
 
Thanks, that was a big help
 
My pleasure ;)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top