Zero Gravity: ISS Orbit & Neil Degrasse Tyson

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kghosh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the term "zero gravity" is a misnomer when referring to the International Space Station (ISS). Instead, astronauts experience weightlessness due to being in a state of free fall, which allows them to float. The gravitational force acting on the ISS is not zero; it is this gravitational force that enables the ISS to maintain its orbit around the Earth. The confusion arises from the distinction between gravitational force and the sensation of weight, which is absent in free fall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and free fall
  • Familiarity with the concept of weightlessness
  • Basic knowledge of orbital mechanics
  • Awareness of the effects of microgravity on human physiology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of free fall and its implications for astronauts
  • Study the effects of microgravity on human health, particularly bone density
  • Explore the principles of orbital mechanics and how gravity maintains orbits
  • Learn about the terminology used in physics regarding forces and weight
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, aerospace engineers, astronauts, and anyone interested in understanding the effects of microgravity on human physiology and the mechanics of orbital motion.

kghosh
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I read in a physics textbook that it is not zero gravity in ISS but the fact that the ISS is in "free fall" makes astronauts float around. They do not feel any normal force because the vehicle they are in are also in free fall along with them. Then I watched Neil Degrasse Tyson talk about bone loss in ISS because astronauts are in zero gravity. If it is zero gravity then why is the ISS in orbit? There should be no centripetal force to keep it in orbit. I am confused!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term 'zero gravity' is often used when referring to things in free fall.

It is inaccurate.
 
The gravitational force on the Space Station obviously is not zero. It is gravity after all that makes the Space Station orbit the Earth.

The term "zero gravity" does not refer to the force due to gravity. It refers instead to all forces except gravity. When you go to an amusement park and take a ride that bills itself as having a zero g roll, or a zero g drop, gravity is not changing during the course of the ride. Your uneasy stomach tells you that something is changing. That something is your "apparent weight" or "scale weight".

You can't feel the force due to gravity. You can't conduct a local experiment that measures gravity. An example: An accelerometer placed at rest on the surface of the Earth registers an upward acceleration of 9.8 meters/second2. Why? The answer is that the accelerometer does not (and cannot) measure gravity. It measures everything but gravity. In this case, it measures the normal force from the ground that pushes the accelerometer upward. The accelerometer does not sense the downward force from gravitation, so even though the accelerometer is at rest with respect to the Earth it registers an upward acceleration with respect to the Earth.

When NASA and Dr. Tyson speak of the problems such as bone loss due to the zero g environment of space, they are referring to weightlessness (scale weight) rather than gravity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K