Zero-Point Energy: Calculating the Minimum Value

'AQF
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
"Consider a particle with mass m moving in a potential U=1/2kx^2, as in a mass-spring system. The total energy of the particle is E=p^2/(2m)+1/2kx^2. Assume that p and x are approximately related by the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principal, px approximately equals h.
a) Calculate the minimum possible value of the energy E, and the value of x that gives this this minimum E. This lowest possible energy, which is not zero, is called the zero-point energy.
b) For the x calculated in part (a), what is the ratio of kinetic to potential energy of the particle?" -University Physics, by Young and Freedman pg. 1517

I do not know how to answer this question.
For (a), I assume that you need to take the derivative of E=p^2/(2m)+1/2kx^2 to minimize it, but in respect to what variable?
For (b), since E=U+KE, the ratio must be (E-1/2kx^2)/(1/2kx^2), but I am unsure of what that would be without part (a).

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem tells you to assume that p and x are approximately related in a certain specific way by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Try solving this relation for p in terms in x and plugging into the Hamiltonian. Can you find a minimum of the resulting expression?

This is a standard way to estimate the ground state energy of a bound system.
 
What is the "Hamiltonian" that you refer to?
Thanks for your help.
 
Sorry, the Hamiltonian is just the energy.
 
Last edited:
What energy (E, KE, or U)?
 
Come on now, AQF, work with me here. I can't just tell you answer. What energy are you trying to minimize?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top