How Many Rational Zeros Does the Polynomial f(x) = x³ + 4x² - 4x - 16 Have?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greywolfe1982
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
The polynomial f(x) = x³ + 4x² - 4x - 16 can have a maximum of three rational zeros, as it is a cubic equation. However, the question regarding the number of possible rational zeros is interpreted differently, leading to confusion among participants. The Rational Roots Theorem suggests there are ten potential rational candidates, including both positive and negative values. Ultimately, while the polynomial has three actual rational zeros (-4, -2, and 2), the discussion highlights the ambiguity in the question's wording regarding possible rational zeros. Clarification on the interpretation of the question is needed for accurate understanding.
Greywolfe1982
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider
f(x) = x^3 + 4x^2 − 4x − 16.
a) How many possible rational zeros does f(x) have?
1. None
2. Two
3. Ten
4. Three
5. Five

The Attempt at a Solution



My first response was answer 4. - Three zeroes. I
a) solved for the zeroes on paper
b) graphed it on a graphing calculator
c) realized that a third degree polynomial can have three zeroes
d) answered the next question, asking what the zeroes were, correctly.

Apparently I'm misunderstanding the question though, because answer 4 is not correct. So just what is the question asking? I thought it was simply "how many zeroes does it have", but I guess I'm missing something.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The question asks: How many possible rational zeros does f(x) have? I think it is a bad question though, because the polynomial has a possibly of having 3 zeros, and if I'm not mistaken, all of these zeros could potentially be rational.
 
All of the zeroes are rational - I'm going off memory, but I believe they were -4, -2, and 2. Regardless, they were all integers. That's why I'm so confused.
 
Greywolfe1982 said:
All of the zeroes are rational - I'm going off memory, but I believe they were -4, -2, and 2. Regardless, they were all integers. That's why I'm so confused.

Then it appears that the answer is incorrect.
 
It is possible that the question is asking how many different values are possible for a rational root from the rational roots theorem. I agree that it is a poorly worded question.
 
So the answer is 5...correct?
 
Actually, I remembered that rational roots allows both positive and negative roots, so I would say 10... but who knows how this question is to be interpreted. Five is the closest to any sort of right answer if three isn't correct.
 
The question might be asking how many rational candidates are there for zeroes in this cubic. If that's the correct interpretation, then the answer is ten. The candidates are \pm 1, \pm 2, \pm 4, \pm 8, and \pm 16.
 
Thought about it some more and remembered it's plus or minus, came on here and read what I was thinking.

Thanks guys
 
  • #10
As n!kofeyn said, that is a badly worded question. Obviously, a cubic equation cannot have more than 3 zeros and so not more than three possible rational zeros.

However, there there are 10 rational numbers that, by the rational number theorem, are possible zeros.
 
  • #11
You can always substitute x = y + p and then obtain other possible rational solutions. The intersection of all these sets of solutions is the correct answer, so I think the correct answer is 3 if there are 3 rational solutions. In fact, you can save a lot of time by shifting your variable. E.g., if you see if x = 1 is a solution you find that:

f(1) = -15

So, x = 1 is not a zero. But this result is nevertheless useful, becaus it is clear that the polynomial g(y) defined as:

g(y) = f(1+y)

has 1 as the coefficient of y^3 and the constant term is

g(0) = f(1) = -15

So, if we apply the Rational Roots Theorem to g(y), we find that the zeroes of g(y) can be:

y = ±1, ±3, ±5,±15

Since g(y) = f(1+y), this means that we need to add 1 to these numbers to obtain the possible rational zeroes of f(x):


x = 0, 2, -2, 4, -4, 6, -14, 16

If you strike out those candidates that are not on the original list, you are left with:


x = 2, -2, 4, -4, 16

If you play the same game with x = -1, you find:

f(-1) = -9

therefore putting y = -1 + x gives the candidates:

y = ±1, ±3, ±9

So,

x = -2, 0, -4, 2, -10, 8

Striking out those candidates that are not on the previous list, leaves us with:

x = -2, -4, 2

Which are the three correct solutions.
 
Back
Top