Zombie PDE Model: Creating a Theoretical Outbreak

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lionheart814
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model Pde
Lionheart814
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm currently taking a Partial Differential Equations class, and for one assignment we have to come up with a model for a theoretical zombie outbreak. Well anyways, this is what I have gathered thus far:

- I am defining my u(r,z,t) to be the population density of humans, where r=radius, z=zombies, and t=time.
- There will be a continuous flow in and out of humans out of the boundary.
- I am letting my boundary be a circular region, suppose a 35 meter radius.
- The population density of both zombies and humans is dependent on the radius, r, of the region. For example if you have 100 zombies in a particular radius with 50 humans, if you increase the radius then the population density decreases.

I think I may have my boundary condition where Du/Dr(35,z,t)= flux, since the normal derivative will always be the radius.My Initial condition is u(r,z,0)= u0

Now, the PDE is where I am having trouble, I can't figure out what Du/Dt is (the rate of change of human population density with respect to time).I tried modeling it similar to the heat equation, but that doesn't work since I only have one spatial dimension in r, and no theta. As r changes as does the total density (zombies and humans) and therefore human density.

If no one knows how to do it this way, then how about in terms of polar coordinates with theta?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laplacian in polar coordinates is
\nabla^2 f= \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(r\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}\right)+ \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial \theta^2}

If f is circularly symmetric (independent of \theta), this is just
\nabla^2 f= \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(r\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}\right)
 
-_____- let's go grab some more beer

i hope this formula helps
dbb551c0e0dbf23c75b37ef11a0a0192.png


then use this

3ea647783b5121989cd87ca3bb558916.png


this is best formula

150px-Circle_Area.svg.png


:shy:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry, but that is of little help THawk and Red. I do not know who this Laval person is, and I would appreciate that you cease your trolling at once, or face certain consequences by a moderator.

Thank you.
 
mr lionheart
we're gona send this link to dr. lav

gl~

and i hope this formula helps~

c89ca8d1a8d2b51c3887d7ea7833ff18.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you are all in the same class? I'm glad I'm not teaching that class. (And so should you be.)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top