Car Crash Scenario Math: Is 114285 Pa Too High?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simulating a car crash scenario, where a user calculates pressure and acceleration for an 80 kg passenger in a vehicle traveling at 20 m/s. The calculated pressure of 114285 pascals and an acceleration of 300 m/s^2 raised concerns about their validity, as they seemed excessively high. Comparisons were made to human body pressure under different conditions, suggesting that the calculated values might not be as alarming when considering body elasticity and movement during impact. Additionally, a correction was noted regarding the acceleration unit, indicating a possible error in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of accurately modeling human responses in crash scenarios.
Frank_Horrigan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi I am trying to simulate a car crash scenario mathematically and come up with reasonable numbers for a project. The problem is I do the calculations and everything seems mathematically correct but the numbers seem weird.

I simulated an 80 kg passanger in a car crash that was going 20 m/s and the car has crumple zones of .5 m, the seatbelts streatch 20 cm, and the airbag+seatbelt area on the driver is .2 m^2

After doing the calculations I got numbers which seem high but I don't know, considering this is a pretty fast crash here.

I got pressure on the driver of 114285 pascals, with an acceleration of about 300 m/s.

Area these numbers ridiculously high and I did something wrong, or do they seem about right considering the scenario?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if one takes the area of the ball of your foot to be four centimeters by four centimeters you get a pressure of about 500 kPa if you stand on one foot (it is probably even smaller than this estimate). Your pressure is about 100 kPa, which is one fith of the pressure when a person stands one one foot. So this pressure you are stating is quite low by comparison.
 
Hidden factor

You may also not be considering the natural elasticity of the human body.
http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/safety/images/chest-impact.jpg
Take, for example, the ability of the limbs to extend outward (forward) in a collision. Because the torso of a human body makes up for only about 40-50% of someone's weight (that's a generous estimate), that allows for a considerable amount of mass to continue moving even after the chest is stopped.

The head rolls forward, the arms extend out, the legs push forward and outward, and even the hips slide forward... allowing the entire body to compensate for the force of the impulse. It's like being tackled - you don't want to tighten your muscles up because the impact will just hurt more - relax, and your body has more time to absorb the force. :smile:

I know those factors are almost impossible to account for when performing calculations (since you don't have a crash test dummy of your very own... if you do, you are a very lucky guy). But hopefully that may shine some light on your too-high acceleration problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
supplemental

Frank_Horrigan said:
I got pressure on the driver of 114285 pascals, with an acceleration of about 300 m/s.

FYI, 300 m/s is a measure of velocity (you meant m/s^2?)
Also, your numbers don't quite match up - did you drop an exponent somewhere in your calculations?

Atmospheric pressure: 1 atm = 101325 pascals = 101.325 kPa
Acceleration: 300 m/s^2 = 30.6 G's
...just to give your numbers some context.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top