Fairly simple dimensional analysis- somehow gone wrong

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratios of the French decimal week and second to their standard counterparts. For part A, the correct ratio of the French decimal week to the standard week is determined to be 10/7, equating to approximately 1.43. In part B, confusion arises regarding the conversion of French seconds to standard seconds, with the correct ratio being 100,000 French seconds to 86,400 standard seconds, leading to the answer of 0.864. Participants clarify that the ratio should compare the same time periods, specifically using days as a common unit. Ultimately, the calculations are confirmed, resolving the initial misunderstandings.
tigerlili
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For about 10 years after the French Revolution, the French government attempted to base measures of time on multiples of ten: One week consisted of 10 days, one day consisted of 10 hours, one hour consisted of 100 minutes, and one minute consisted of 100 seconds. What are the ratios of (a) the French decimal week to the standard week and (b) the French decimal second to the standard second? Assume that the definition of a "day" remains the same.


Homework Equations



i know that for part A, you can do a simple ratio of 10/7 to get the correct answer of 1.43

for part B, I converted 1 french week into 1,000,000 french seconds
and 1 standard week into 86,400 seconds, originally, but i thought i had messed up.. so i got 604,800 the second time. i know that the first value i got is correct, because the correct answer is .864. I'm just having trouble recalling how i got that number, because i erased my work.. and, furthermore, i thought that the ratio was of french to standard, not vice versa. either way, 86400/1000000 is not .864, it is .0864. so obviously some number must be wrong, whether it is 1,000,000 or 86,400, but i have done the calculation over many times, and cannot find my mistake..as silly as that sounds :X

The Attempt at a Solution


woops.. see above!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tigerlili said:
[ i thought that the ratio was of french to standard, not vice versa.
That's what you wrote in the statement of the problem.


To get the correct answer, you must compare the number of normal seconds and revolutionary seconds in the same period, for example a day. You have compared the number in a normal week and a revolutionary week, which are different periods.
 
okay, so i found my mistakes.. but, still, the question says to do a ratio of french to standard.. but 100,000/86,400 is not .864 which is the textbook's correct answer. it would have to be 86,400/100,000.. which is not what the question asks for, which is why i am confused

thanks for your help
 
1 French second = 1/100,000 day.

So:

French second / standard second
= ( ? days) / ( ? days)​

Note the "days" units cancel, leaving a numerical ratio.
 
ahh i get it now, thanks so much!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top