Speculators and fully anticipated expansionary monetary policy problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a question related to New Classical macroeconomics, specifically addressing the distribution of new money in the economy. A participant references a presentation to clarify the concept, highlighting the "helicopter effect," which assumes an equal distribution of new money. However, they also note that this assumption is often unrealistic, as discussed in the book "The Case Against the Fed." The conversation emphasizes the complexities of monetary policy and its implications on economic distribution.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/6386/macro2.jpg

I don't understand the answer to this question.
The answer is
C
but I don't understand why.

BiP
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like C from the above power point. Of course that assumes an equal distribution of new money (the helicopter effect) which is not really the case as is pointed out in, “The case against the fed”.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Back
Top