Velocity & Force on a Moving Charge in Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The formula F = q*B*v provides the magnitude of the force on a moving charge in a magnetic field but does not reveal the direction of the velocity or magnetic field. Consequently, it is impossible to determine the individual components of velocity (x, y, z) solely from this formula. The angle between the velocity and the magnetic field, along with the field's strength and direction, also influences the charged particle's motion. To fully understand this behavior, additional concepts like the Lorentz force law and the right-hand rule are necessary. Thus, a comprehensive analysis requires more than just the basic force equation.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Are there components of the velocity that cannot be determined by measuring the force if one looks at the formula F = q*B*v?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soaring Crane said:
Are there components of the velocity that cannot be determined by measuring the force if one looks at the formula F = q*B*v?
For non-relativistic cases, the vector form of that equation provides all info concerning the force exerted on a moving charge by a magnetic field:
:\qquad \underline{F} \ = \ q\underline{v}\times \underline{B}


~~
 
Last edited:


Yes, there are components of velocity that cannot be determined by measuring the force using the formula F = q*B*v. This formula only gives the magnitude of the force experienced by a charged particle moving in a magnetic field, but it does not provide information about the direction of the velocity or the magnetic field. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the individual components of the velocity (i.e. the x, y, and z components) using this formula alone. Other factors such as the angle between the velocity and the magnetic field, as well as the strength and direction of the magnetic field, also play a role in determining the motion of the charged particle. To fully understand the behavior of a charged particle in a magnetic field, additional equations and considerations are needed, such as the Lorentz force law and the right-hand rule.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top