Just a question regarding Q.M text by griffith.

  • Thread starter Thread starter haplo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffith Text
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of Griffiths' textbook for preparing students for graduate-level quantum mechanics courses. Users express concerns about the book's depth, noting that it may be too simplified and lacking in critical discussions. One participant suggests supplementing Griffiths with Shankar's text for a more comprehensive understanding. Comparisons are made to Robinett's quantum mechanics book, which is perceived as more robust. Overall, there is a consensus that additional resources may be necessary to adequately prepare for graduate studies in quantum mechanics.
haplo
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Wondering if your professor using this as main text, how good will it prepare you for Graduate Q.M course. Would you recommend to simultaneously study material from some other text. I wonder because we are finishing chapter 2 and problems do not seem that challenging, just bunch of integral evaluation and some derivations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I used it for my undergrad Quantum course. It's a terrible book.
 
are you in grad school now?
 
haplo said:
are you in grad school now?
Yes.

I highly recommend picking up something like Shankar to supplement Griffiths. Griffiths' book is, at best, watered down, and at worst, completely lacking important discussions.
 
thats the impression i am having, while comparing it to Q.M by Robinett.

thanks for reply
 

Thread '"WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians'

The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Will using Griffith and Purcell benefit a beginner in E&M?
Replies
4
Views
6K
Best Intro to Quantum Mechanics: Griffiths vs Dirac
Replies
33
Views
7K
Linear Algebra What are some recommended second texts for self-studying linear algebra?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Classical Reading Goldstein's Classical Mechanics as an Undergraduate
Replies
33
Views
6K
Classical Prerequisites for Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics
Replies
6
Views
10K
Classical Source recommendation on Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
3K
Classical How many of a chapter's problems do I do before moving to the next chapter?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Good graduate text in quantum mechanics
Replies
6
Views
5K
Same chapters from Griffiths being used for EM1 and EM2?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Studying Regarding learning from Griffiths
Replies
11
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top