Pluto & Charon's Center of Mass - 6871.5 km

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pluto
AI Thread Summary
To find the center of mass of the Pluto-Charon system, the calculation must consider the radii of both bodies rather than their diameters. The distance between their centers is approximately 19,900 km, factoring in their respective sizes. The mass of each body can be approximated based on their diameters, with Pluto being significantly more massive due to its larger size. The correct approach involves treating them as point masses and using their respective distances from the center of Pluto to determine the center of mass. The final calculated center of mass is approximately 6871.5 km from Pluto's center, though the initial approach contained errors in using diameters instead of radii.
rsala
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Pluto's diameter is approximately 2370 km, and the diameter of its satellite Charon is 1250 km Although the distance varies, they are often about 1.99×104 km apart, center-to-center.

Assuming that both Pluto and Charon have the same composition and hence the same average density, find the location of the center of mass of this system relative to the center of Pluto. answer in km.

Homework Equations


\frac{\Sigma m*r}{\Sigma m}

The Attempt at a Solution


i didnt know how to approach this problem since i didnt know the masses of the objects, so i treated each unit of kg in its diameter as 1 unit of m, so the mass pluto would be 2370,000*M...? (converted all units to meters, not sure if it matters)

so, since the question asks for center of mass relative to pluto center, i don't include plutos m*r since its initial position is 0.

\frac{1250,000*M*(1.99*10^{4}*1000)}{2370,000*M + 1250,000*M}

i guess m can factor out here.\frac{1250,000*(1.99*10^{4}*1000)}{2370,000 + 1250,000}

this equals 6871547 meters, 6871.5 km
this is incorrect, I don't think this is correct because i just have the feeling that i don't know what I am doing here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You made a very simple mistake.
You used the diameter of the objects and not the radius. Treat the objects as point masses, so the distance between the two objects surfaces plus the radius of each object is the total distance between the two.

EDIT: Also, notice that one is bigger than the other (one diameter is 2370km and the other is 1250km). Given this, one will be more massive then the other. How would you figure out how much more massive one is with respect to the other?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top