Laplace's equation on a rectangle with mixed boundary conditions

[nathan12343]

Homework Statement

Solve Laplace's equation inside the rectangle 0 \le x \le L, 0 \le y \le H with the following boundary conditions

u(0,y) = g(y)\text{, } u(L,y) = 0\text{, } u_y(x,0) = 0\text{, and } u(x,H) = 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I know that with Dirichlet boundary conditions one can simply superpose 4 solutions to 4 other problems corresponding to one side held fixed and the others held at 0. Can the same technique be generalzed for mixed boundary conditions, like I have above? I don't think so, because when I do that the solution I get for
u(0,y) = g(y)\text{, } u(L,y) = 0\text{, } u(x,0) = 0\text{, and } u(x,H) = 0
does not satisfy u_y(x,0) = 0[/tex].<br /> <br /> Does anyone have a hint for how I might find solutions which simultaneously satisfy the boundary condition at u(0,y)\text{ and for }u_y(x,0)?

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Homework Statement

Solve Laplace's equation inside the rectangle 0 \le x \le L, 0 \le y \le H with the following boundary conditions

u(0,y) = g(y)\text{, } u(L,y) = 0\text{, } u_y(x,0) = 0\text{, and } u(x,H) = 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I know that with Dirichlet boundary conditions one can simply superpose 4 solutions to 4 other problems corresponding to one side held fixed and the others held at 0. Can the same technique be generalzed for mixed boundary conditions, like I have above? I don't think so, because when I do that the solution I get for
u(0,y) = g(y)\text{, } u(L,y) = 0\text{, } u(x,0) = 0\text{, and } u(x,H) = 0
does not satisfy u_y(x,0) = 0[/tex].<br /> <br /> Does anyone have a hint for how I might find solutions which simultaneously satisfy the boundary condition at u(0,y)\text{ and for }u_y(x,0)?

<br /> <br /> Why not find the general 2D solution to Laplace&#039;s equation, using separation of variables (i.e. u(x,y) \equiv X(x)Y(y))and then substitute your boundary conditions to find the particular solution?

 

[HallsofIvy]

Let v(x,y)= u(x,y)- xg(y)/L

Then \nabla^2 v= \nabla^2 u- xg&quot;(y)/L= -xg&quot;(y)/L since \nabla^2 u= 0.

The boundary conditions on v are v(0,y)= 0, v(L, y)= g(y)- g(y)= 0, v_y(x, 0)= -xg'(0)/L, v(x,H)= -xg(H)/L.

Because the boundary conditions on x are both 0, you can write v as a Fourier sine series:
v(x,y)= \sum_{n=1}^\infty A_n(y)sin(n\pi x/L)

You will need to write -xg"(y)/L as a Fourier sine series in x so you can treat g"(y) as a constant.