- 15,524
- 769
edward said:To hell with the speculators. most of them paid only a small percentage of the value of a security to get the insurance.
It appears to me that direct intervention with the homeowners struggling with mortgages would be a quicker way to snuff out the flames. The important thing is to do it now and not wait until a committee swayed by lobbyists makes the decision sometime next year.
To hell with those homeowners. Most of them are speculators, too. I do not want the government lending any financial support to those who refinanced their mortgage every time the paper value of their house went up so that they could afford to have a fistful of Starbucks lattes a day, a ski trip in St. Moritz, a weekend or two at Cabo, and an African safari. They can start drinking McDonalds coffee and spend their weekends at a nearby state park. I do not want the government lending any financial support to those who committed fraud on their loan applications, claiming they had an annual income twice their real income. That real estate agents and loan examiners colluded in that fraud is irrelevant. The fraud would never have happened if the applicants hadn't been a part of the greed equation.
Mine has tanked, too. It looks like I will have to work another twenty years -- in other words, well into my seventies.OK so this does sound nutz...I'm just venting. My son's 401 (k) is down by over 40% and that's just through the end of September.![]()
Anyone who lied on their application did exactly that.edward said:Oranges and apples. How many home buyers intentionally bought a home with failure in mind??