What is the force exerted on an elastic object, on elastic collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces experienced by an elastic object during an elastic collision with a wall. The object decelerates to zero velocity at maximum compression, converting its kinetic energy into elastic potential energy. Key equations involve the spring constant (k), mass (m), and the relationship between maximum force (F_max) and average force (F_avg), with the latter being half of the maximum force. A more massive object will compress more, while a stiffer object will compress less, leading to different energy absorption characteristics. The average speed during compression is considered to be half of the initial speed, despite non-constant deceleration.
Oldor
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An elastic object (F = k e) is thrown horizontally at a wall, so it is traveling at constant velocity, which then rebounds elastically (energy conserved). I'm only interested in when the object first makes contact and decelerates to 0ms-1 which will be when the object is at maximum compression. I thought horizontal motion would make it a bit simpler.
The object will come to rest compressed (before rebounding), due to the force of the collision. The deceleration it undergoes will be an average one, half the maximum which is at maximum compression. At rest/compression, all of the object's kinetic energy will be converted into elastic potential energy (assuming the object doesn't break).

I'd like to know the average, or maximum, force that the object experiences, due to the object's elasticity/spring constant, and due to the object's mass. I can then see quantitatively, for example, if a less-stiff (lower k) object absorbs more energy on impact, so the force that it experiences is less but extension greater (if this is the case).


Homework Equations



F,max = - k x e
F,avg = m x a,avg
F,avg x t = -m x u
KE = 0.5 x m x v^2
PE = 0.5 x F x e


The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure if it's best to go about it in terms of energy or momentum.
If I could work out the time it took to be compressed/stop, or the distance it took (i.e. the compression), I think it would help.

The following didn't get me far:

PE = 0.5 x F,max x e
F,max = 2PE / e

e = F,max / k
= 2PE / k e

e^2 = 2PE / k

PE = KE = 0.5 x m x u^2

e^2 = m x u^2 / k

e^2 / u^2 = m / k
e/u = sqrt( m/k )
t = sqrt( m/k) Is this anything?

Substituted t into
F,avg x t = -m x u

To get
F,avg^2 = k x m x u^2

But using that doesn’t agree with the equations of motion (v^2 = u^2 + 2as) I don't think.

Any advice or an alternative method would be good (preferably along the lines of the above).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An elastic collision is not one where there is zero loss of energy,energy is conserved in all collisions, it is one where there is zero loss of kinetic energy.Perfectly elastic collisions can happen with atomic scale objects ,for example gas atoms colliding with a wall, but not with macroscopic objects.The smaller the distortion at impact the smaller the amount of kinetic energy converted and the more elastic the collision is.A good example of this is given by Newton's cradle,the distortion of the steel balls on collision being much smaller than it would be if say tennis balls were used.
 
Last edited:
You were doing good until you started messing with the time, and incorrectly assumed that the time, t, was equal to the displacement, e, divided by the initial speed, u, when actually the time, t, is the displacement, e, divided by the average speed, u/2. But you don't need to calculate the time. You have already solved for e in your prior equation (e^2 = mu^2/k). Then F_max = ke, or F_avg =ke/2.
 
So a more massive object would distort more, and a stiffer object would distort less.
For two objects of the same mass, would the stiffer experience a greater maximum force on collision/deceleration, to compensate for the lesser distortion in order to convert the same kinetic energy to elastic potential energy?

Also, is the average speed u/2 even though deceleration is not constant (acc. increases with F increasing with e)?
 
Oldor said:
So a more massive object would distort more, and a stiffer object would distort less.
For two objects of the same mass, would the stiffer experience a greater maximum force on collision/deceleration, to compensate for the lesser distortion in order to convert the same kinetic energy to elastic potential energy?
Yes, provided u is constant.
Also, is the average speed u/2 even though deceleration is not constant (acc. increases with F increasing with e)?
Yes, although the acceleration is not constant, it is linear with the displacement, thus the average acceleration is a_max/2, and the average speed is u/2. Or look at it this way: Since the work done by the spring is 1/2ke^2, and for a force varying linearly with distance (as per F = kx), work is F_avg(e), then equate the two to get F_avg = F_max/2.
 
I see, thanks, that helps alot
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top