Simple Voltage in Conducting Spherical Shell Question

AI Thread Summary
In a spherical conductive shell with charge Q, the electric field E outside the shell is given by E = K*Q/R^2. To find the voltage V on the surface, the equation V = E*R simplifies to V = K*Q/R. Inside the shell, the electric field is zero, leading to a constant voltage throughout the interior. This constant voltage inside the shell equals the voltage at the surface, confirming that the voltage in the center of the shell is not zero but rather equal to the surface voltage. The logic regarding voltage in the center of a spherical conducting shell is clarified by understanding that the electric field is zero inside, resulting in a constant potential.
Switch11b
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
When working on homework problems having to do with voltage, there is often the stipulation that V=0 at infinite. If you are dealing with a spherical conductive shell with charge Q, the Electric Field E is equal to K*Q/R^2, where K is the vacuum permittivity constant and R is the radius of the shell. To find the voltage on the surface of the shell you would then use V=E*R, which equates to the general form of the voltage equation V=K*Q/R. Following this course of thought, the voltage in the center of the shell would be V=K*Q/R, where R is 0. Making the voltage in the center of the shell zero. Is the voltage in the center of a spherical conducting shell really zero or did my logic fail me somewhere?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inside the conducting shell, the voltage will be constant. Inside the shell of charge the E field is no longer K*Q/R^2. If you have a shell, the E field will be zero inside the shell, easily proved with Gauss's law. This means that the voltage will be constant inside the shell, and the voltage has to be continuous across the boundary of the shell so the constant value inside the shell will be equal to the potential at the surface of the shell.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top