Uranium in Nuclear Reactors: Why Use It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter otomanb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uranium
AI Thread Summary
Uranium is primarily used in nuclear reactors due to its natural fissile isotope, U-235, which is essential for sustaining nuclear reactions. In contrast, thorium is mainly Th-232, which is fertile rather than fissile, requiring the addition of a fissile isotope like U-235 or Pu-239 to initiate a fuel cycle. Radium lacks a fissile isotope, making it unsuitable for nuclear fuel. Uranium is typically found in solid forms such as oxides or phosphates within various ores. Overall, uranium's unique properties and availability make it the preferred choice for nuclear energy production.
otomanb
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
As we know that usually and mostly Uranium is used in Nuclear Reactors. So ma question is why Uranium is used as compared to thorium and Radium.
Second thing that Uranium is found in solid, powder or which form it's found.
thanks
:rolleyes:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Uranium has a natural fissile isotope (U-235), which constitutes approximately 0.7% of natural uranium, with the remainder being U-238 (and traces of U-234).

Thorium is essentially all Th-232, which is fertile, not fissile. In order to use thorium in a fuel cycle, one must add a fissile isotope, e.g. U-235 or Pu-239, initially until sufficient U-233 is produced for recycle back into the Th-fuel. Pu-239 is a by product of neutron capture in U-238.
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=90&n=142 (use Zoom 1)

Radium does not have a fissle isotope.

Uranium is found as an oxide or phosphate in various ores.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/default.aspx?id=446 - uranium deposit geology
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/default.aspx?id=26789 - phosphate ores
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top