Second Quantization: Creation & Annihilation Operators

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I am reading about second quantization. The kinetic energy operator T we write as

<br /> \hat T = \sum\limits_{i,j} {\left\langle i \right|T\left| j \right\rangle } \,c_i^\dag c_j^{}.<br />

Now, the creation and annihilation operators really seem to be analogous (in some sense) to the ket and the bra in first quantization, since they tell us which matrix element we are talking about.

What is the reason for this? I understand that we have the new states in Fock space (the occupation number states), but my book never illuminates why the creation and annihilation operators designate the matrix elements just like the outer product in first quantization does.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Niles,

The creation operator c_i^+ adds one particle to the system in the single particle state labeled by i. If |i\rangle denotes the state where the system has one particle in single particle state i, then you know that |i\rangle = c_i^+ |\text{vac} \rangle. This means you can write c^+_i = |i \rangle \langle \text{vac} | + \text{...} where ... consists of states with more than one particle. Thus in the single particle Hilbert space the creation operators and annihilation operators are literally the outer products you are more familiar with. For example, c_i^+ c_j = |i \rangle \langle \text{vac} | \text{vac} \rangle \langle j | + \text{...} = | i \rangle \langle j | + \text{...}.

Does this help at all?
 
Hi Physics_Monkey

Yes, that is a very good explanation. Although I do not quite get what you mean by: "where ... consists of states with more than one particle.". We have |i \rangle \langle \text{vac} |, which is an operator. To this operator we add multiple-particle states (i.e. vectors) - is that allowed?
 
Last edited:
What I mean is that because because c_i^+ adds one particle to any state, the expansion of c_i^+ in terms of outer products can't stop with | i \rangle \langle \text{vac} |. There must be other terms like |\text{2 particles} \rangle \langle \text{1 particle} |. However, each of these terms contains at least one bra or ket with more than one particle. This is what I mean by ... containing states with more than one particle.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top