How Does the Human Eye Detect the Dimmest Starlight?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the intensity of the dimmest star detectable by the human eye, which is estimated at 1.14592 x 10^(-13) W/m² based on detecting 9 photons/s. Participants confirm the use of the equation I = N * E and suggest checking calculations for accuracy. The ratio of this intensity to noon sunlight, given as 1400 W/m², is debated, with one participant arriving at a final answer of 8.217 x 10^(-17). The conversation highlights the adaptability of the human eye in detecting low light levels.
Yroyathon
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
hi there. there's an example in the book, but I'm having a little trouble here.

Homework Statement


Assume that the human eye can pick up as few as 9 photons/s in the visible range. Based on this, estimate the intensity of the dimmest star that can be detected by a night-adapted eye. What is the ratio of this intensity to the intensity of noon sunlight, some 1400 W/m2? This large intensity range means that the eye is indeed a very adaptable instrument.
Answer format = (intensity of 9 photons/s / intensity of noon sun)

use 3mm for the radius of the pupil.
use 550 nm for wavelength.

Homework Equations


I=Power/Area
I=N*E, N is the number of photons/(m^2*s)
E=h*f
f=c/lambda
A=Pi*r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I want the intensity, which is N * E, which is (N * h * c) / (Pi * r^2 * lambda). I get the intensity of the dimmest star on the human eye as 1.14592 * 10^(-13).

With the given intensity of noon sunlight (do I need to adjust this for the area of the pupil?...), I divide it. 1.14592*10^(-13) / 1440 = 7.95775*10^(-17).

but this is wrong, so... either I was supposed to adjust the noon intensity, or I've made one or several other mistakes.

I'd appreciate any insights or tips.

Thanks!

,Yroyathon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your equation is correct
check ur calculations^_^
 
I got the same numbers. Why do you think it's wrong? What do you think the right answer is?
 
I got 1.150429803e-13 for the intensity of the star

divide it by 1400, the final answer should be 8.217e-17
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top