You need to move a 500 N box across the floor. You pull on the box

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jkblackbear08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Pull
AI Thread Summary
To move a 500 N box across a floor with friction, a 200 N horizontal force is applied, resulting in balanced forces since the box moves at a constant velocity of 3 m/s. The coefficient of friction can be calculated using the relationship between the frictional force and the normal force, which is determined by the weight of the box. When pulling the box at a 30-degree angle, the applied force has both horizontal and vertical components, affecting the normal force and thus the frictional force. The tension in the rope can be found by analyzing the forces in both the horizontal and vertical directions, ensuring they balance out. Understanding Newton's Second Law is crucial for solving these problems effectively.
Jkblackbear08
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
You need to move a 500 N box across the floor. You pull on the box with a rope which is also horizontal. The floor is not frictionless. You move the box so that it moves with a constant v of 3m/s by applying a 200 N force.

Coefficient of Friction?

Also,

same question except pull the box at an angle of 30 degrees from the horizontal, use 0.4 coefficient.

what is the tension in the rope?

I just really can't even get started on this one, i have no idea, my professor really didnt cover to much of this but gave us 4 similar questions on it, any help would help me out...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


This should have been posted in the homework help sub-forum using the associated template for homework threads (which would have provided a systematic framework for you to articulate and approach the problem).

The basic principle you need to understand in order to solve this problem is Newton's Second Law of Motion. Since the box's velocity is constant (in the horizontal direction) and zero (in the vertical direction), it is not accelerating, which implies that the forces on it are balanced (in both the horizontal and vertical directions). Therefore the NET horizontal force on the box must be zero. Since there are only two horizontal forces, the applied force due to the tension in the rope (forwards), and friction (backwards), these two must be equal to each other (in magnitude)

Therefore, you KNOW what the magnitude of the frictional force must be in this situation. You also know what the normal force is (because you are given the weight and you know that the vertical forces are balanced). So, you have enough information to determine the coefficient of friction for sliding motion between the box material and floor material.
 


Friction force = Coeff. friction X Normal force

The normal force is perpendicular to the friction force (the one pressing on the ground)

When there is a slope, the weight of the box is still pointing down and can be divided in two components: A horizontal one and a vertical one (with respect to the slope). Determine the friction force and carefully add the force horizontally (wrt the slope) to find the tension.
 


For the second part of the problem, the applied force (or tension) is now NOT entirely horizontal. It has both horizontal and vertical components. You can figure out what these components are in terms of the unknown quantity (the tension), because you know the angle at which this force is applied.

Then it's just the same thing again. Newton's second law requires that if the acceleration is zero (horizontally and vertically) then:

- the sum of the forces in the horizontal direction is zero

- the sum of the forces in the vertical direction is zero

The balance of the forces in the vertical direction is a little different from in the first part of the problem, because instead of just two vertical forces (normal force and weight), there are now three (the third being the upward component of the tension). This means that the normal force will change -- it will not be the same as it was in the first part of the problem.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top