Electron Proton Scattering vs Tunneling

what_are_electrons
When a beam of electrons (near relativistic or non-rel.) intersects with a beam of protons or a "fixed" proton target, what percentage of the electrons tunnel through the proton(s) or is there an absence of electrons on the exact opposite side (the backside) of the proton?

This question is a rate of scatter vs rate of tunneling question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons incident on fixed protons : this seems similar to Rutherford's (?) experiment with a gold film (electrons on Au nuclei). I may not be answering your specific question (never did proton beams), but I can say that the considerable fraction of e- that reflected of thin gold films led to the discovery of atomic nuclei (early late 1800's or early 1900's). A very common experiment in school. The fraction reflecting must be around 1% to 10% if I remember correctly. The fraction tunneling is not measurable in this classic experiment, but must be unbelievably small in reality.
 
Thanks for the feedback.

I checked McDaniel's book on Atomic Collisions, but did not find electron scattering from protons. This question is aimed at resolving whether or not electrons can or can not tunnel through the nucleus of an atom. Admittedly an electron in an orbit may be different in structure and energy than a free electron, but I really do hope to get some help with this question.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top