More Stable Electron Configuration For Copper

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the electron configuration of copper and its stability. It highlights that copper exhibits a unique stability due to its 3d subshell being filled, unlike the expected configuration of 4s² 3d⁹. The conversation notes that similar stability is observed in silver and gold, while chromium demonstrates increased stability with a half-filled 3d subshell. The participant expresses confusion over the teacher's explanations and acknowledges the complexity of the topic, suggesting that a deeper understanding may require more advanced knowledge. The goal is to grasp these concepts ahead of an upcoming lecture in AP Chemistry.
MysticDude
Gold Member
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't really a homework question, but it is part of a lecture powerpoint that the teacher will go through with on Monday and I was just getting ahead so I can understand better.

[PLAIN]http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/3088/cuelectronconfig.png

Homework Equations



NONE

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought it would be the first one because 4s^2 has a higher energy level so I thought that copper would be more stable. I'm not sure if I'm understanding the wording correctly. So I don't know the correct answer but I hope someone can help me understand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming you're in high school or first year chemistry, and the explanation given is that there is a 'special stability' associated with the Copper 3d shell being full, as well as Silver and Gold. In addition, there is also the Chronium having more stability with a half full 3d subshell as opposed to the expected configuration of 4s2 3d4.

There is supposed to be a much more complicated explanation, and I've tried asking my profs as well, but they say that I won't understand it with the current knowledge I have. For now, first years are just supposed to memorize those elements, (Cr, Cu, Ag, Au).

Sorry if that answer is not sufficient, perhaps someone else on the physics board could be of greater help.
 
Last edited:
Well, the class is just finished 2nd week of AP Chemistry. This lesson is to be taught on Monday and I wanted to get ahead :P. Thanks for your explanation! I think that my teacher's wording is hard to make out. I mean he is really smart (he wrote books and articles and is called Dr.) but he isn't the most fluent in English, by that I mean that he is understandable, but he can leave some things out XD.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top