Antenna feed affecting antenna length?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimmyAlz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Length
AI Thread Summary
The length of an antenna feed does not directly affect the physical length of the antenna, as antennas are typically designed to be resonant at a specific frequency regardless of feed length. However, the electrical length of the feed can impact performance, particularly regarding losses and impedance matching. In RF design, achieving a good standing wave ratio (SWR) is crucial, and experimentation is often necessary to optimize the design. For a GSM module operating at 900 MHz with a quarter-wave antenna, ensuring the feed is close to 50 Ohms is essential for effective transmission and reception. Ultimately, practical testing and prototyping are key to successful antenna design.
JimmyAlz
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Does the length of an antenna feed affect the length of the antenna one should use?
Intuitively I'm thinking 'NO' since in some applications the user supplies (variable length) antenna feed cables, but the antenna is still made to be resonant to the application frequency.

BUT in the RF design package I use, the "electrical length" of feeds seem important, and is
always calculated.

I'm just looking to be a little more sure about this before I push the button and produce 100 PCB's.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It depends on the load. With a resistive load or resonant antenna that has the same feed impedance as the lines impedance it makes no difference what the length of the line is other than more length = more loss.
 
I see! Thank you for your reply :)
 
Hi - Um...to this question, for what it's worth, as far as I know, I can give you a definite 'yes' and 'no'. Not trying to be funny...I assume you are talking about a long wire antenna? I have made long wires, Yagis, folded dipoles and others over the years. My first thought is just how close do you want to be...are you talking about a receiving only or both transmission and receiving. Either way everything in life is a compromise. So...I would say you can start out without any particular length of feed line and depending on loads and any matching networks go from there. I again assume you are concerned about SWR. Here is where theory and experimentation comes in...and I will go out a limb and say that I would be very surprised that any amount of calculation would get one as close as the acutual experimentation. Grounding. bending the feed lines, looking at things cross eyed and any number of things will give different results. In my humble opinion, I would say to make your feed line any approprate length just to get from here to there. I don't think that you will have to worry about producing any '100 PCB's'. You can play with your Smith Charts and if you can't get your SWR to 1:1, I would just say hit m' with what you got. I would like to hear any other slant on this.
WH6OC
 
YesIsam: Thank you for your input :)
I see I should have been a little more specific:

I am working with a GSM communications module, to be mounted on a printed circuit board.
GSM = European cellular phone standard.
So working frequency is about 900Mhz.
And yes it will both receive and transmit.
I have chosen a quarter-wave antenna (83mm) because any longer and it would not fit the case of the product.

I agree with you that experimentation/prototyping is always
the key to any successful design.

Anyway after Averagesupernova's answer I have decided I'm in the green, as long as I make the feed as close to 50 Ohm as I can get.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top