Manipulation of Wave Packet and Plane Wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on manipulating a wave packet represented by a superposition of plane waves. The task involves demonstrating that the wave packet can be expressed as a plane wave multiplied by a time-dependent modulation factor. Participants suggest substituting the expressions for p1, p2, E1, and E2 into the time-dependent wave function to reveal its structure. Additionally, the modulation factor's time dependence is linked to the propagation speed of the envelope, calculated as v = ΔE/Δp. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical approach needed to solve the problem effectively.
Brilliant
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider this wave packet:
\Psi(x)=A exp \left[\frac{i(p + \Delta p)x}{\hbar}\right] + A exp \left[\frac{i(p - \Delta p)x}{\hbar}\right]
(from a previous problem)

This time-dependent form of the packet is:
\Psi(x)=A exp \left[\frac{i(p_{1}x-E_{1}t)}{\hbar}\right] + A exp \left[\frac{i(p_{2}x-E_{2}t)}{\hbar}\right]

Where
p1 = p + (delta)p
p2 = p - (delta)p
E1 = E + (delta)E
E2 = E - (delta)E

a) Show that \Psi takes the form of plane wave times a time-dependent modulating factor.
b) Show that the modulation factor has a time dependence that can be interpreted as the propagation of an "envelope" moving with a speed v=(delta)E/(delta)p.

Homework Equations



According to the book a plane wave looks like this:
\Psi(x)=A exp\left[\frac{i(px-Et)}{\hbar}\right]

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm afraid I don't know where to start. I don't feel like this should be particularly difficult, but I just don't know what to do. Maybe someone can nudge me in the right direction.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brilliant said:
This time-dependent form of the packet is:
\Psi(x)=A exp \left[\frac{i(p_{1}x-E_{1}t)}{\hbar}\right] + A exp \left[\frac{i(p_{2}x-E_{2}t)}{\hbar}\right]

Where
p1 = p + (delta)p
p2 = p - (delta)p
E1 = E + (delta)E
E2 = E - (delta)E
I would substitute p1 = p + Δp into the equation for Ψ(x,t), and similarly for p2, E1, and E2. See what you can come up with when you do that.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top