How does neutron absorption turn uranium into plutonium?

AI Thread Summary
When U-238 absorbs a neutron, it transforms into U-239, which subsequently decays into Np-239 and then into Pu-239 through beta decay. This process involves the emission of beta particles, which are electrons, leading to the increase in atomic number from 92 (U) to 94 (Pu). The discussion clarifies that the electrons are expelled during beta decay, resulting in a neutral atom rather than an ion. Additionally, Pu-239 can further absorb neutrons, leading to isotopes like Pu-240 and Pu-241, although these have shorter half-lives and lower neutron capture cross-sections. Overall, the conversion of U-238 to Pu-239 highlights the complexities of nuclear transmutation and fission processes.
ampakine
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I keep reading that when a U-238 atom absorbs a neutron it turns into Pu-239. How does that happen? If I'm not mistaken Pu-239 is U-238 plus 2 protons and 2 electrons and minus 2 neutrons. When U-238 absorbs the neutron and becomes U-239 I can see that it can turn into Pu-239 if 2 neutrons decay into 2 protons + 2 electrons. Is that what happens? Are the electrons expelled like in regular beta decay or do they remain in the nucleus so that a neutral atom is formed rather than an ion?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
U (Z=92), Np (Z=93), Pu (Z=94)

U238 + n => U239 => Np239 + ß => Pu239 + ß (leaving out the electron-associated antineutrinos that accompany beta emission) The ß particles slow down in the vicinity of the decay. Electrons are quite mobile and they generally migrate toward positive charges or up the electric potential.

The U239, Np239 and Pu239 can also absorb neutrons and elevate A to 240, which can also absorb neutrons to A=241. Pu239 is more likely to fission upon neutron absorption. Np-240,241 appear to have low n-capture cross-sections, or the cross-sections are not measured, and the half-lives are relatively short, so the isotopes aren't around long enough to capture neutrons. See figures.
 

Attachments

  • z94n147zl1csigg5085.png
    z94n147zl1csigg5085.png
    20.2 KB · Views: 802
  • z93n146zl1ct129754.png
    z93n146zl1ct129754.png
    11.5 KB · Views: 785
Last edited:
Here are the principal transuranics in a uranium/plutonium based fissile system.

Code:
Isotope   Half life (yr)
 Pu-236        2.858
 Pu-238       87.7
 Pu-239    24110
 Pu-240     6561
 Pu-241       14.29
 Am-241      432
 Pu-242    37500
 Am-243     7370
from www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/
 

Attachments

  • lwr-tranuranics.jpg
    lwr-tranuranics.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 901
  • z94n147zl1cdm4054.png
    z94n147zl1cdm4054.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 691
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top