Increase in weight if an object is illuminated

  • Thread starter Thread starter climatos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    increase Weight
climatos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Increase in weight if an object is illuminated

Are there experiments which show that the weight of a body, with initial mass between 1 g and 1 kg, really increases if illuminated for a certain time?

Photons have energy E = hf but no mass. If the weight of a body gets bigger after being radiated with light it means that energy indeed converts to mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heating the body up would have more effect than simply illuminating. However I doubt if the weight gain cold be measured.
 
mathman said:
Heating the body up...I doubt if the weight gain cold be measured.

I saw what you did there!

Are you wearing a Freudian slip? :approve:
 
Cavendish's equipment was remarkably sensitive for its time. The force involved in twisting the torsion balance was very small, 1.74 x 10^–7 N, about 1/50,000,000 of the weight of the small balls or roughly the weight of a large grain of sand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment

Raising the temperature of an object (increasing its heat energy) increases its mass. For example, consider the world's primary mass standard for the kilogram, made of platinum/iridium. If its temperature is allowed to change by 1°C, its mass will change by 1.5 picograms (1 pg = 1 × 10^−12 g).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence

F = 1.74 * 10^–7 N is the weight of a mass m = 1.77 * 10^–8 g = 17.7 ng (measured by Cavendish in 1797).

1 kg heated to 1000 degree, using laser light, will increase its mass by 1.5 ng (I guess).

If Cavendish was able to detect forces as small as 17.7 ngf, more than 200 years ago, maybe an increase in mass of 1.5 ng can be measured today with enough precision. I do not know, this is just a question.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top