Dose E=hn means quantization of energy?

athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
I have an example class yesterday, but one question troubled me.

In part (b), why does E=nhf?
For me, it seems E=nh is enough, why does the equation involve frequency f after quantization?
 

Attachments

  • e=hn.jpg
    e=hn.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 554
Physics news on Phys.org
One answer might be: The unit of E (energy) is a Joule, the unit of h (Plank's constant) is Joule time a second. If you want the equation to be correct you need to multiply h with something that has units of 1 over a second.Roman.
 
athrun200 said:
In part (b), why does E=nhf?
For me, it seems E=nh is enough, why does the equation involve frequency f after quantization?

What do you mean "E = nh is enough"? That equation is not correct, because as pointed out above, the units are not correct.
 
h = energy per cycle.
f = number of cycles per unit of time.
your quantization must include a quantization of time.
 
Thanks! I have forgotten to consider the unit.
 
Energy within a single system is quantized, but there are different energies that result from following the E=nh model in different systems, so if you consider every possible system energy is continuous, just like the light spectrum.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top