Frequency of Black body radiation HELP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the frequency of black body radiation emitted by a burner at 683K, which has a peak wavelength of 4.25×10^-6 m. The relationship between wavelength and frequency is highlighted, emphasizing that frequency can be derived using the speed of light. The calculated frequency is 7.07×10^13 Hz. Participants note the complexity of the relationship between peak wavelength and frequency, referencing Wien's displacement law and Planck's law. The question's level is debated, with opinions on whether it aligns more with introductory or advanced physics courses.
re496210
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If a black body is heated to a temperature T (in degrees K), the most intense radiation is at a wavelength lambda (in m), where λ·T = 2.9×10−3m*K. If the burner on your electric stove is at a temperature of 683K (really hot and glowing), find the wavelength of the most intense black body radiation emitted by it.

The wavelength is 4.25×10-6 m.

What is the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted by the burner in the problem above?

(I do not know how to find the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
re496210 said:
If a black body is heated to a temperature T (in degrees K), the most intense radiation is at a wavelength lambda (in m), where λ·T = 2.9×10−3m*K. If the burner on your electric stove is at a temperature of 683K (really hot and glowing), find the wavelength of the most intense black body radiation emitted by it.

The wavelength is 4.25×10-6 m.

What is the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted by the burner in the problem above?

(I do not know how to find the frequency of the most intense black body radiation emitted)

You've found the wavelength, now what's the relationship between wavelength and frequency? Hint: what's the speed of the waves?
 
Thank you. I figured out that it is 7.07x10^13 Hz
 
phyzguy said:
The peak wavelength and peak frequency are not simply related by lambda*nu = c. Try reading this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien's_displacement_law

Good catch, phyzguy. I had overlooked the variations of Planck's law with respect to wavelength, frequency, and wavenumber.

I wonder what level course this question is taken from? It's presented in a way that I would associate with introductory level, but the wavelength vs frequency subtlety for Planck/Wien I would peg at a more advanced level.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top