Problems that are wrong that I must find errors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jkohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding mathematical problems that contain errors for the purpose of identifying and correcting them. The user seeks challenging examples related to single variable calculus and classical mechanics, specifically proofs that are flawed, such as the "All horses are the same color" argument. There is a request for recommendations on resources or books that provide such erroneous problems. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the errors in these proofs to enhance learning. Overall, the user is looking for engaging ways to practice error detection in mathematical reasoning.
Jkohn
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Basically what I am trying to do is solve problems by finding errors in the run down of the problem.
An example would be one of those proofs that 1=2, debunking them. I want to find problems like that; a lot harder and more relevant to what I am learning. Would like it for single variable calculus and also for classical mechanics..
Any recommendations??
-cheers

**I am not sure if I posted in the correct place
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I just want to clarify things. What you want is problems in which we have found errors, and you want us to show you the problems for you to find these errors? I don't think this would yield a lot of results for you to work on. Or do you want us to give you just ANY problem and see if you can find an error in it?

What exactly are you asking here?
 
What I want are problems that are done with errors (purposely) so that I can find those errors and correct them. I am sure there is a book out there--have not found one.
 
Here is the "No horse of a different color" problem that occurs in many different guises.

An inductive proof that "All horses are the same color". Consider a set containing one horse. Obviously "all" horses in that set are of the same color. Assume that, for some number, k, any set of k horses must be of the same color. Let A be a set of k+1 horses. Call one the horses "a" and let B be the set of all horses in A except "a". There are now k horses in the set so they are all of the same color. Call one of the horses
"b" and let C be the set of all horses in A except "b". Again, C contains k horses and so all are of the same color. But "a" is in set C so all horses in C must be the same color as "a" and "b" is in set B so all horses in B must be the same color as "b". Since both "a" and "b" are the same color as any other horse in A they are the same color and so all horses in A are of the same color. Therefore, by induction, all the horses in any herd, of any size, must be the same color.

Where is the error in that argument?
 
If you like classical geometry here is a great book of false proofs:
The Mathematical Recreations of Lewis Carroll: Pillow Problems and a Tangled Tale (Dover Recreational Math)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top