A Conjecture on the Collatz Conjecture

Vodkacannon
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have created a program in javascript that has tested integers on the collatz conjecture.
Recall that the collatz conjecture says given any natural number n you must divide n by 2 if it is divisible by 2 and multiply n by 3 and add 1 if it is not divisible by 2. Repeat this process and you will always reach 1.

Well this program that I have created does exactly this: Determines if the amount of steps it takes to get to 1 is equal to the initial value used in the algorithm.

It turns out that after checking millions of numbers, the only number that equals the # of steps to get to 1 is 5.

I have conjecture that this is the only case possible, out of all natural numbers.

I also have an idea why. As n → ∞, # of steps → grows larger. (you can see this by looking at the program's output.)
But it does not always get larger. Some initial values have more steps that smaller initial values.
Still the general trend is that the steps required increases, thus the probability that nsteps = n, approaches 0%.

Please give me ideas, what else should I study about the Collatz Conjecture? What should I try to find out? Something more interesting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
heres something that might peak your interest, the collatz tree.
start at 1. for the left node, multiply by 4 and add 1.
for the right node:
if evenly divisible by 3 no right node.
if leaves remainder of 1 mod 3, multiply by 4 subtract 1 and divide 3.
if leaves remainder of 2 mod 3, multiply be 2, subtract 1 and divide 3.
Code:
1--5--21--85
   |      113
   |      75
   3--13--53
      |   35
      |   23--93
      |   15--61
      17--69
      11--45
       7--29
       9
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top