Can dental floss reduce friction in physics experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
In a physics lab experiment involving a glass rod and mass, participants seek ways to reduce friction beyond using oil. Suggestions include creating a bushing with plastic and lubricant, as well as applying soap or wax to the string. The choice of glass is noted for its low static and kinetic friction properties. There is curiosity about whether dental floss, which is waxed, has a lower coefficient of friction compared to regular rope. Alternatively, using monofilament fishing line is recommended for its low friction characteristics.
Aki
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
This is for a lab report that I have to do for physics class. In the lab, we have to tie one end of the string with some mass in one end, add a glass rod through the string, and then tie some more mass to the other end of the string. We have to hold the glass rod and start whirling one end of the mass around in a cir cle. Now my question is, other than adding oil around the rim of the glass rod, what another way to reduce friction? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing you could do is make a bushing. Take a small circular piece of plastic and place it inbetween the string and the glass. You can add some kind of lube inbetween the glass and the plastic to reduce friction in there.

BUT! I think that your teacher choose glass as the medium of the rod becuase it already has a very low static and kinetic friction force. (excuse the terms) ( could not think of the correct definition.)
 
I'm taking a bit of a stab here because the test set up doesn't make a whole lot ofsense to me. I need to see a picture. How about just rubbing some soap or wax on the string? You can't do too terribly much to the glass to reduce it's mu.
 
Would dental floss(wax) have a smaller mu than a normal rope?
 
dental floss

If string isn't required, then go to a sporting goods store and get monofilament fishing line. This stuff has a very low coefficient of friction.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top