Light clock with spaceship moving vertical at .99c

ebodet18
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
So what would happen if there was a spaceship moving at 99% the speed of light straight up. The spaceship has a light clock, so a photon of light moving bouncing between 2 mirrors in such a way that the light moves ALMOST in sync with the spaceship moving up. In theory wouldn't the light photon move very very slowly up to the top mirror and back to the bottom. Would time be almost come to a complete stop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ebodet18 said:
So what would happen if there was a spaceship moving at 99% the speed of light straight up. The spaceship has a light clock, so a photon of light moving bouncing between 2 mirrors in such a way that the light moves ALMOST in sync with the spaceship moving up. In theory wouldn't the light photon move very very slowly up to the top mirror and back to the bottom. Would time be almost come to a complete stop?

Welcome to PF!
To answer your question:
It seems that way but not really! - Why?
Lights speed is absolute, meaning, it always travels at the speed of light relative to EVERY viewpoint. So...If you were moving at .99 c, and you saw a photon, that photon would STILL be moving 300,000 m away from you every second. THIS is why time and space stretch in relativity. Since C was absolute, Einstein saw that if the speed of light was ALWAYS the speed of light, something else had to give (i.e space and time) In order for it to make sense that a photon would still be traveling away from you at 300,000 m/s if you were traveling .99% of c, Einstein postulated that you the observer would need to experience time much slower in order for this to occur. Hope that helps!
 
Last edited:
Ahh that's interesting! Thanks for the quick answer!
 
ebodet18 said:
Ahh that's interesting! Thanks for the quick answer!
No problem! Relativity is fascinating
 
ebodet18 said:
So what would happen if there was a spaceship moving at 99% the speed of light straight up. The spaceship has a light clock, so a photon of light moving bouncing between 2 mirrors in such a way that the light moves ALMOST in sync with the spaceship moving up. In theory wouldn't the light photon move very very slowly up to the top mirror and back to the bottom.
Assuming the spaceship's light clock is oriented in the usual manner--parallel to the direction of travel--then the light would be moving just slightly faster than the mirror as the light traveled from bottom to top. So as observed by you on Earth (if you could make measurements of the light's travel between mirrors) the light would cover that distance rather slowly. (The speed of light is the same, but the mirror is moving away from the light.) But during the reverse trip (from top back to bottom) the light would be moving towards the oncoming bottom mirror. So from your viewpoint on earth, the travel time going up is greater than the travel time going down.

Of course from the viewpoint of the people in the space ship, everything would work normally.
Would time be almost come to a complete stop?
No. While the "ticking" of that moving light clock would be slow as observed by you, it only slows by a factor of about 7.
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Question about Parallel Transport'

In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Analyzing Time Dilation in a Spaceship-Mars Scenario
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Light clock running faster than light?
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Einstein thought experiment confusion: “light clock in a moving frame”
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Contradictory time dilation equations
Replies
13
Views
1K
I For a relativistic spaceship, what is the most recent news the ship gets from Earth?
Replies
6
Views
1K
B How does Einstein's equation work? Why do we need to square c?
Replies
18
Views
1K
I Is Length Contraction Accounted for in the Analysis of a Moving Clock?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Is the concept of a one-way speed of light meaningful and measurable?
Replies
25
Views
4K
I Leading Clocks Lag: Twin Paradox Explained
Replies
20
Views
2K
I What is the proper time of a vertically moving inertial clock?
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top