Why are we not tetrachromats in twilight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Humans are not tetrachromats in twilight due to the differing sensitivities of rods and cones. While humans have four types of light receptors—three cone types and rods—rods do not contribute to color perception in low light. In twilight, rods are active but their signals are not processed by the neurons responsible for color, leading to a lack of tetrachromatic perception. This phenomenon is supported by studies, including those by Oliver Sacks, which illustrate that damage to color-processing areas in the brain can result in an inability to perceive color despite intact rod function. Consequently, the experience of color is primarily a brain processing function rather than solely a result of the eye's receptor types.
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
I assume that we are not, because it should have got more mentions if we were.

Man has 4 kinds of light receptors. Rods and 3 types of cones.

All cats are grey in the dark, because no cones work in the dark, and there is only 1 type of rods.

In bright light, man is trichromatic because rods are dazzled, and there are 3 types of cones.

But twilight?

The sensitivity of rods does not match that of any type of cones. The maximum sensitivity of rods is here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cone-response.svg
described as 498 nm, which is further (36 nm) from the maximum green sensitivity at 534 nm than the difference between green maximum and red maximum (30 nm).

In twilight, man should have 4 types of receptors functioning with very different spectral sensitivities. 3 types of cones, and rods.

Why do the pictures of cones and rods not form a full tetrachromatic picture and perception of tetrachromatic hues in twilight?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The experience of color is not solely dependent on the mechanism of the eye. Signals from the cones are "processed" into the personal experience of color in the brain:

http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/1998/08.06/BrainsColorProc.html

Signals from the rods aren't lead to the color processing neurons and will always be experienced as shades of light and dark.

Oliver Sacks examined, and wrote about, a man who lost the ability to experience color after a car accident damaged the color area of his brain. The story is online here:

http://www.csh.rit.edu/~oguns/school/psychology/Articles/colorblindpainter.pdf

This man retained his ability to process information from the rods of his eyes but found life in a black and white world very distressing. But this is the answer to your question: The neurons that receive signals from rods are not capable of creating the experience of color.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-deadliest-spider-in-the-world-ends-lives-in-hours-but-its-venom-may-inspire-medical-miracles-48107 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versutoxin#Mechanism_behind_Neurotoxic_Properties https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0028390817301557 (subscription or purchase requred) he structure of versutoxin (δ-atracotoxin-Hv1) provides insights into the binding of site 3 neurotoxins to the voltage-gated sodium channel...
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom
Back
Top